The New “Rigged” Movie Covers the Zuckerberg Interference in 2020 Election — Here’s What They Missed

ORIGINAL LINK

By Jim and Joe Hoft

The “Rigged” documentary details Mark Zuckerberg’s $400 million investment into the 2020 election.   The cash infusion was used to help rig the entire election for Joe Biden, the missing candidate.

The movie offers a close look at the Zuckerbucks used by the left to assist them in their scheme to steal the election from the most popular president who garnered the most votes in US history.

Rigged AND Stolen

The Gateway Pundit agrees with the producers that the election was “Rigged,”  We also believe the 2020 election was stolen.

The movie centers around the approximately $500 million that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg injected into the 2020 presidential election to help Joe Biden.

The movie opens up with Kellyanne Conway bragging about the Facebook ads from the 2016 elections.  She has a background as a campaign consultant so this makes sense. But it does ignore the hundreds of conservative websites pumping out thousands of articles and millions of page views supporting Donald Trump and exposing the Hillary campaign in 2016.  Shortly after the 2016 election Zuckerberg and Facebook targeted, censored and deleted most of the prominent pro-Trump pages.   Today most of those conservative Facebook giants are gone. Zuckerberg destroyed them.

One of the early conclusions of the film is that Zuckerberg was behind a massive “get-out-the-vote” campaign. Where? The Gateway Pundit previously reported that prior to the 2020 election Republicans knocked on 1 million doors. Democrats knocked on ZERO doors and openly admitted it. There was NO get-out-the-vote campaign on the left.  There were no massive call centers.  There was no significant GOTO campaign for Joe Biden.  He rarely even campaigned.

The movie mentions CTCL and VoteatHome operatives were helping the operatives inside the polling centers.

The movie does not mention that Republicans were excluded from the process and left out of most of the counting rooms.  It was leftist operatives who were “curating absentee ballots” inside the rooms in several states.  It was leftist operatives who had keys to the absentee ballot storage rooms.

The movie claims the Zuckerberg money helped Democrat turnout surge in Wisconsin. What?  How?

The movie misses the mark on the actual voter fraud in the 2020 election.

The movie ignores:

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the “tossup” House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win – a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin — thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump — something not seen since Ronald Reagan.

In the corporate world every instance of fraud, whether $1 or $5 million is to be shared with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.  This is specifically identified in most corporate audit committee charters.  But after the 2020 election with fraud everywhere, then-Attorney General Bill Barr looked the other way.  He punted.  He ignored his responsibility to address the criminal acts in plain sight and instead he covered them up.

There was fraud everywhere.  We saw it behind closed doors, in the late hours, and across the country, especially in the swing states.

We saw Republicans from across the country blocked from witnessing the counting process. As soon as Republicans were prevented from overseeing the election counting process the election process should have been shut down and the FBI and military brought in if necessary.   But this didn’t happen.  The GOP elites went AWOL.  Why?

Every effort to look into the voting machines used in the election has been challenged.  Material amounts of chain of custody documentation are missing everywhere.  All this together spells guilt and yet every day we find out more.

The 2020 election was Rigged – but more importantly, it was Stolen.

The post The New “Rigged” Movie Covers the Zuckerberg Interference in 2020 Election — Here’s What They Missed appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

How Coercion Compromised the Vaccine

The fight over the Covid vaccines has become an epic struggle. It’s not just about who should get the shot and how many shots. The fight ever more centers on issues of effectiveness and safety of the product itself. One group is convinced they are very dangerous for many people.

ORIGINAL LINK

Appeals court revives Biden's federal employee vaccine mandate

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday revived President Joe Biden's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees in the executive branch. The decision comes after the appeals court said in February it was reviewing a lower court's hold on the mandate.

ORIGINAL LINK

833 Athlete Cardiac Arrests and Serious Issues, 540 Dead, Following Covid Injection

A total of 15 players were unable to finish the Miami Open 2022 tennis tournament, including the male and female favourites.

ORIGINAL LINK

Biden Administration Stops Shipments of COVID-19 Treatment to All States

The U.S. government on March 5 immediately halted all shipments of a COVID-19 treatment to states and ordered health care providers not to use the drug. The actions were taken because of the increasing prevalence of BA.

ORIGINAL LINK

David Stockman on the Coming Stock Market Crash of Biblical Proportions

International Man: Whether we like it or not, the reality is, the Federal Reserve has an enormous influence over the dollar and the stock market. And right now, the Fed has an urgent and fateful decision to make.

ORIGINAL LINK

State Department Memo In Early 2020 Assessed That Lab leak Was Most Likely Origin Of COVID-19

ORIGINAL LINK
State Department Memo In Early 2020 Assessed That Lab leak Was Most Likely Origin Of COVID-19

Authored by Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke via The Epoch Times,

A newly released memo from the U.S. State Department reveals that government officials knew early on that the COVID pandemic likely originated at a lab in Wuhan, China.

That memo, dated April 2020, states that out of five possible origins for COVID, a lab leak was by far the most likely. The memo also suggests that alternative theories had been introduced to prevent a lab leak from being investigated. The memo, which focuses almost entirely on the likelihood of a lab leak, contains a large amount of information that wasn’t known publicly at the time it was written.

Although a lab leak is now widely accepted as a likely origin for the virus, when the memo was written, a concerted effort was underway to discredit that possibility. It also raises the question of what senior State Department leadership—including then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo—knew and why the information was withheld from the public.

According to the newly released memo, the State Department knew as of April 2020 that the central issue surrounded an obsession with collecting and testing a massive amount of virus-carrying bats on the part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and China’s Wuhan-located Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The State Department noted that lab testing of the earliest-known patient at the Wuhan Central Hospital in December 2019 determined that the virus was a “Bat SARS-like Coronavirus.” At the time this patient was tested, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hadn’t disclosed that there was any problem at all.

When they finally acknowledged an outbreak, they initially blamed it on pneumonia. It was only at the end of January that the CCP finally started admitting that COVID-19 was caused by a new virus that was transmitted between humans.

By that time, the virus had already been seeded across the globe and any chance at suppression had been lost. It was during this same period that the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, was made aware of the virus’s likely origin, having been told by a group of scientists whom he was funding that there was a high probability that the virus was engineered.

Although it’s been known since June 2021 that Fauci and the NIH covered up his knowledge of the virus’s origin, the State Department’s early insight into these matters wasn’t fully known until late March 2022, when the transparency group U.S. Right to Know obtained the April 2020 memo.

Two Labs

The memo, titled “An Analysis of Circumstantial Evidence for Wuhan Labs as the Source of the Coronavirus,” comprises five pages and is written in military BLUF style, meaning “bottom line up front.”

The memo begins by stating that one of two Wuhan labs is the likely source of the COVID outbreak. The two labs identified by the state department are the Wuhan CDC’s lab located in downtown Wuhan and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where Shi Zhengli was known to have conducted dangerous gain-of-function experiments on bat viruses.

The State Department’s focus on the Wuhan CDC lab as a possible source is particularly significant as that facility is located only a few hundred feet from the Huanan Seafood Market where an already infected customer may have caused a superspreader event in December 2019.

Notably, the World Health Organization’s lead investigator of the virus’s origin, Peter Ben Embarek, privately told a Danish TV crew that he suspected that the Wuhan CDC lab was the origin of the pandemic. Embarek, who promoted a natural origin for the virus in his public report, privately noted that the CDC lab had mysteriously moved to its new downtown location in early December and that such a move may have increased the chances of a lab leak or accidental spillage.

The other lab identified by the State Department as the likely source of the pandemic is the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been the main focus of attention over the past two years.

The State Department memo noted that the Wuhan Institute, by far the most logical place to investigate the virus origin, had been completely sealed off from outside inquiry by the CCP. The memo also noted that a gag order regarding both Wuhan labs had been issued on Jan 1, 2020, and a major general from the People’s Liberation Army had assumed control over the Wuhan Institute of Virology since early January of 2020.

The State Department memo emphatically stated that “All other proposed theories are likely to be a decoy to prevent inquiry to Wuhan CDC and Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

It bears repeating that the memo was written in April 2020.

That’s because the State Department’s decoy argument mirrors the actions taken by Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health (NIH) head Dr. Francis Collins who–at the same time this memo was written–were actively suppressing and censoring any public discussion of the lab leak scenario. When Fox News ran a story in April 2020 suggesting that the virus came out of a Wuhan lab, Collins immediately contacted Fauci to explore ways the two men could “put down this very destructive conspiracy.”

Collins had previously told Fauci and his group of scientists that “science and international harmony” could be harmed if the lab leak theory took hold. Collins’s directive led Fauci’s group to publish two papers that categorically dismissed the lab leak theory, one in the medical journal the Lancet and the other in the scientific journal Nature. Those two papers would become the cornerstone of combined efforts from Fauci’s scientists, the media, Big Tech, and the U.S. government to suppress any discussion of a lab leak, while simultaneously promoting the natural origin theory.

The State Department memo also lists many facts that the public has only come to know in piecemeal fashion over the course of the past two years. We’ve previously covered many of these details on our show, including that the Wuhan CDC had a resident “Batman”—Tian Junhua—who bragged about personally having collected more than 10,000 virus-carrying bats as lab samples from Chinese caves.

Tian also was widely known for his recklessness and carelessness during his collection process.

Regarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the State Department memo noted that the director of the lab, Shi Zhengli, had conducted gain-of-function engineering of bat viruses to make them more easily transmittable to humans. As we now know, the defining feature of the COVID-19 virus, its furin cleavage site, is what makes the virus particularly transmissible in humans. While no furin cleavage site has ever been observed in naturally occurring SARS coronaviruses, Shi was part of a 2018 research proposal that aimed to insert exactly such a feature into coronaviruses.

The State Department’s memo also highlights the poor safety standards at the Wuhan Institute, a fact that could easily lead to an unintentional leak of the deadly virus to the outside population. Interestingly, the memo also questions the disappearance of lab worker Huang Yanling, whose bio, profile, and picture were scrubbed from the institute’s website shortly after the outbreak. To this day, Huang’s whereabouts and well-being remain unknown.

Lastly, the memo takes a detailed look at a Chinese medical professional whose online name is Wu Xiaohua. Wu claimed that Shi Zhengli was playing God by creating coronaviruses with the specific aim of making them more transmissible in humans. Wu also claimed that Shi used intermediate animals in her lab and that her lab’s management of deadly viruses was appallingly poor and negligent.

The State Department memo found Wu’s claims to be credible and that assessment holds up well, given the information that has been made public in the intervening two years. We now know Shi had an active plan to insert furin cleavage sites into bat viruses, we know that she used humanized mice to test how her virus creations would affect humans, and we know that her lab was repeatedly cited for its poor safety record.

The most striking takeaway from the memo is that it focuses almost entirely on the lab leak scenario, reflecting that the State Department was almost certain in April 2020 that the virus had originated in a lab. What remains entirely unclear is why neither the State Department nor Secretary Pompeo released this information as soon as they had it.

Had the memo been made public nearly two years ago when it was written, the course of events would have been very different. Knowing that the virus came out of a lab would have refocused public attention and the search for remedies could have been more focused.

There also would have been more concerted efforts to prevent future leaks. Rather than misdirecting the public toward a natural origin, Fauci and the NIH would have been exposed for their role in funding the work at the Wuhan Institute.

Most importantly, the Chinese Communist Party would have been subjected to greater international pressure for its role in suppressing any advance information regarding the outbreak. The memo might also have had an impact on the 2020 presidential election, as voters tended to see Donald Trump as far more capable than Joe Biden in taking on the CCP.

While we don’t know with certainty why the memo was concealed, the only person who had a constitutional role in deciding if suppression of a lab leak should be the policy of the U.S. government was President Trump. Although it’s possible that Trump decided it would be better to conceal the facts, it’s far more likely that, like all of us, the president was kept in the dark.

Tyler Durden Thu, 04/07/2022 - 23:25

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

53% of Americans admit they're not living a 'healthy' lifestyle

ORIGINAL LINK

(STUDY FINDS) – Half of Americans aren’t taking great care of their health and well-being, new research shows. A survey of 2,000 respondents found 53 percent don’t consider their lifestyle “healthy,” and the same number don’t feel capable of improving their health.

The poll split respondents up by their current household income, with results showing those with a lower income are more likely to agree with this sentiment. Of those with an income between $30,000 and $60,000, about two-thirds don’t feel capable of improving their health — compared to only about half of respondents with an income between $60,000 and $100,000.

Regardless of their income, when asked what’s holding them back from living a healthier lifestyle, a lack of understanding topped the list — 39 percent don’t understand the best actions to take in order to be healthy. Feeling overwhelmed with different options (39%) and the cost (36%) followed closely behind.

Read the full story ›

The post 53% of Americans admit they're not living a 'healthy' lifestyle appeared first on WND.

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

Contamination of U.S. Food Supply Worsens as 50% of Foods Tested Contained Cancer-Causing Glyphosate Herbicide

ORIGINAL LINK

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The Detox Project recently published their latest results from the most comprehensive glyphosate testing of food products ever conducted in the U.S., showing that the contamination of the U.S. food supply with the cancer-causing herbicide glyphosate is becoming significantly worse since their first report published 5 years ago.

In our first report nearly five years ago, we found alarming levels of glyphosate residues in 29 bestselling foods from major food companies in the continental United States, as increases in the spraying of more toxic pesticides was skyrocketing across rural America.

In this new report, we disclose the glyphosate residue testing results of 83 foods found in major Big Box, grocery and natural  food stores purchased in Des Moines, Iowa, including Walmart, Whole Foods, Target, Natural Grocers, and Hy-Vee and foods bought online through Amazon.

Incredibly, more than half the foods tested, a total of 45 foods out of 86 products, contained alarming levels of glyphosate,  ranging from 12 parts per billion (ppb) in “sprouted wholegrain bread”6 from Whole Foods to as high 889 ppb in Walmart’s brand chickpeas,7 to 1,040 ppb in Whole Food’s 365 Brand Whole Wheat Sandwich Bread, to the highest level detected of  1,150 ppb in Hy-Vee’s 100% Whole Wheat Bread.

While none of these foods are genetically engineered, they still contain ingredients that are at a high risk of glyphosate  contamination. There is no GMO wheat or chickpeas on the market in North America. For the past two decades, farmers in  the U.S. and Canada have regularly sprayed Monsanto’s (now Bayer) Roundup on wheat, oats, barley and dry bean crops as a ‘pre-harvest drying agent’ to get the harvested crop to market faster.

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the world’s most heavily used herbicide, Roundup. So even though it has widely been shown that glyphosate is linked to higher rates of cancer, getting it out of the food supply is no easy task.

This report, like our last one, confirms that this practice, known as crop desiccation, exposes the American public to  dangerous and unacceptable levels of glyphosate contamination in foods that consumers are led to believe are healthy.

In 2015, leading international scientists at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found compelling  evidence linking glyphosate to cancer in humans, while a 2019 meta-analysis by independent scientists at the University of Washington found glyphosate increased cancer risks by 41%, specifically non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the immune system that develops from abnormal lymphocytes, and is common in farmers, pesticide applicators and those regularly exposed to glyphosate.

Lymphocytes are a type of immune cell made in the bone marrow that are found in the blood and lymph tissue. If that weren’t concerning enough, in 2017 researchers found that rats exposed to Roundup developed nonalcoholic fatty liver  disease (NAFLD) over a 2-year period, even at “extremely low doses”, 0.1 ppb, while in 2018 peer reviewed research  revealed that glyphosatebased herbicides were able to alter important biological markers relating to sexual development, genotoxicity and damage the gut microbiome of rats in as little as 13 weeks at levels allowed in drinking water in America and considered to be “safe” by the U.S. government.

What is particularly concerning is that even foods labeled as being “USDA Organic” or labeled as free from GMO contamination, also test positive for levels of glyphosate contamination.

Many people, for example, choose gluten free alternatives to wheat, thinking that it is a healthy choice, but the grains, nuts, and seeds that make up most gluten free products are heavily contaminated with glyphosate as well.

Unfortunately, a Non-GMO label on a food or supplement product does not mean that it is free of glyphosate contamination. Of the 26 foods tested that made Non-GMO claims, 18 tested positive for glyphosate, including 2 of the top 5 foods with the highest levels of glyphosate contamination. The levels found in Non-GMO labeled food ranged from 12 ppb to 1,040 ppb.

It  is not without a pinch of irony that some of the highest levels of glyphosate are found in foods marketed as Non-GMO,  which means they do not contain genetically engineered ingredients, since consumers buy these products to avoid Monsanto’s (now Bayer’s) GMO ingredients but are now exposed to high levels of their bestselling weedkiller instead.

With this major test sampling completed, we found that organic foods were significantly less likely to be contaminated with  glyphosate and at much lower levels than either conventionally produced foods or foods certified as Non-GMO.

Of 23 organic foods tested, only 5 were found to contain glyphosate residues and their range, from 13 ppb to 54 ppb, while still deeply concerning, is significantly lower than other foods.

My own company, Healthy Traditions, began testing all of the food we sell for the presence of glyphosate back in 2014, when we did our own testing and investigation and found that most of our certified organic grains that we were selling at the time were contaminated with glyphosate.

We were shocked to learn that the National Organic Program for USDA organic certification allows for smaller amounts of glyphosate to be present even in foods certified organic.

So we mostly abandoned the USDA Organic program, and started testing all of our food ourselves, practicing strict batch control so that we could trace each batch back to the producer.

We now do our own testing for glyphosate, and also for GMOs, as many foods advertised as being free from GMOs also contain small amounts of GMO DNA, especially American corn.

If we receive a test back that has a positive result for glyphosate or GMOs, we won’t sell it, no matter how small the amount.

A “little bit” of poison is still poison.

The Detox Project report addressed the reason why there should be no “safe limit” of glyphosate in any foods.

It is first important to understand how the ‘safe’ level of any toxic chemical is set. Currently the U.S. EPA sets a Reference  Dose (RfD), which is known as the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) in Europe, by taking the lowest no observed adverse effect  level (NOAEL) from animal studies and dividing it by 100.

For glyphosate the current RfD in the U.S is 1.75 milligrams / kilogram of bodyweight / per day or 1.75 mg / kg bw / day. It  may not surprise our readers to know that the ADI in Europe is more than 5x less at 0.3 mg/kg bw /day, even though the  regulators there base their ADI on the same industry studies as in the U.S. – Do you feel safe yet?

The big problem is that both the RfD in the U.S. and the ADI in the EU have already been proven to be far too high by  independent peer-reviewed studies.

• In the pilot phase of the most comprehensive study ever done on glyphosate and glyphosatebased herbicides – the Global  Glyphosate Study – it was shown that glyphosate-based herbicides cause genotoxicity, alteration of the intestinal microbiome  as well as reproductive and developmental effects in both male and female rats, at the currently considered safe  level in the U.S. of 1.75 mg / kg bw / day.
• Other peer-reviewed studies have also shown change in gene function and DNA Damage at the 1.75 mg /kg bw /day  level.

This would normally mean that the EPA’s current RfD safe level should be reduced by at least 100x. However, even that may  not be enough of a reduction, as in smaller non-comprehensive peerreviewed studies, levels that are lower than 0.1 mg/kg  have been shown to cause serious kidney and liver damage in rats.

Currently, we do not know the full effects on our health of glyphosate exposure at very low levels and we thus must follow the  precautionary principle and ban the product from being sold immediately. It is simply not yet possible to set a safe level for glyphosate exposure and anyone who attempts to do so is bending the science.

The best we can do for now is to avoid foods and drinks that have levels over the internationally recognized reliable limit of  detection for glyphosate in laboratories of 0.01 mg/kg (10 ppb), which can be done by consuming brands that are certified Glyphosate Residue Free.

In March 2015, the world’s leading cancer experts at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found that  glyphosate was linked to cancer in humans. Since then, dozens of independent studies published in peer reviewed journals  have found that glyphosate can have multiple negative health impacts including harm to beneficial gut bacteria, birth  defects, infertility, reproductive issues such as miscarriages, shorter pregnancies, increased infant mortality, and certain cancers.

To put these glyphosate residue level results in perspective, the latest peer reviewed scientific research shows that: Roundup  can cause liver and kidney damage in rats at levels as low as 0.05 parts per billion (ppb) and at 0.1 ppb glyphosate has been found to alter the gene function of over 4,000 genes in the livers and kidneys of rats.

In addition, peer-reviewed studies have also found that 0.1 ppb can cause severe organ damage in rats and that levels as  low as 10 ppb can cause oxidative stress and have toxic effects on the livers of fish. Additional peer-reviewed research has found damage to the livers and kidneys of rats at 700 ppb,66 which the EPA considers the allowable level of glyphosate in U.S.  drinking water.

Read the full report here.

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

Who You Allow to Define “Sickness” Determines if You Live in Slavery, or Freedom

What Happens When a Holy and Righteous God Gets Angry? Lessons from History and the Prophet Jeremiah

Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

What is Life?

The Most Important Truth about the Coming “New World Order” Almost Nobody is Discussing

The Seal and Mark of God is Far More Important than the “Mark of the Beast” – Are You Prepared for What’s Coming?

To “Save” America will the Foundation of the Corporate American Christian Church Need to be Destroyed?

The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Mark of the Beast?

Medicine: Idolatry in the Twenty First Century – 6-Year-Old Article More Relevant Today than the Day it was Written

Having problems receiving our newsletters? See:

How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

We Are Now on Minds.com, MeWe, and Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Minds.com, MeWe, and Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.

If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.

The post Contamination of U.S. Food Supply Worsens as 50% of Foods Tested Contained Cancer-Causing Glyphosate Herbicide first appeared on Health Impact News.

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

Von Greyerz: "There Is Going To Be A New World Disorder"

That is what Biden proclaimed in a recent speech. Sadly, as the world has heard in many speeches by the US president, he hasn’t got a clue that his “empire” is collapsing around him.

ORIGINAL LINK