Saturday, August 28, 2021

Fun Facts about the *Spanish Flu*

The "Spanish Flu" never started in Spain - it began in the USA. It was not a "Flu" - despite an ocean of evidence / data, they persisted with the false narrative that it was a "Flu" when in reality it was a bacterial pneumonia - autopsy results showed that bacterial pneumonia killed 92.


China Blacklists Billionaire Actress, Cracks Down On 'Unruly' Internet Fan Culture

China Blacklists Billionaire Actress, Cracks Down On 'Unruly' Internet Fan Culture

While Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's comments at Jackson Hole dominated headlines in the US Friday, news out of China detailed new efforts by Beijing to hinder domestic firms from going public in the US and other foreign markets, while also exposing the target of Beijing's latest crackdown: entertainers and the online communities where their most rabid fans bond over their fandome.

According to the SCMP, Beijing abruptly blacklisted one of China's most popular (and wealthiest) actresses, Zhao Wei. Her entire internet presence was scrubbed for unknown reasons on Thursday evening. Her name was removed from all television series, films, short videos and promotional materials from platforms including Tencent Video, iQiyi and Youku.

Per SCMP, Zhao shot to fame for her role in My Fair Princess, one of the most successful Chinese television shows of all time. It ran from 1998 to 1999.

Weibo's equivalent of a hashtag - called a Chaohua - was also censored to bar information about Zhao.

So far, there has been no official explanation as to why Beijing targeted Zhao, though the move has sparked online speculation about possible motives..

Besides acting, Zhao is a businesswoman, film director and pop singer - this versatility is the true source of her massive wealth, and she's known as one of China's wealthiest entertainers and one of the only billionaire actors.

Outside of show business, the actress became an early investor in Alibaba Pictures. Her husband partnered with Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba, in a 2015 private equity deal.

At times, her loyalty to Beijing has been questioned, like in 2016, when a film she directed called "No Other Love" was attacked for inviting Taiwanese actor Leon Dai to be a leading character. Chinese Internet users accused Dai of being an advocate of Taiwanese independence. Zhao was ultimately pressured to change him.

Zhao isn't the only actress to be targeted by Beijing lately: Chinese actress Zheng Shuang, who was embroiled in a tax evasion scandal earlier this year, was ordered to pay $46.1MM in unpaid taxes, overdue fees and fines this week. It ends an investigation into her finances that reportedly began this spring. Several male Chinese celebrities have also been accused of rape in recent months.

In addition to this censorship, the CCP has issued a new directive attempting to rein in an increasingly unruly fan culture that has created a permissive atmosphere where extreme stalking, leaking of personal information and cyberbullying have become increasingly commonplace. The new regulations would punish platforms that fail to quickly delete verbal attacks directed at fans of different pop stars. The restrictions aim to maintain "political and ideological safety in the cyberspace as well as creating a 'clean' Internet."

Tyler Durden Sat, 08/28/2021 - 22:00


Arkansas doctor under investigation for prescribing ivermectin thousands of times for Covid-19 despite FDA warning


An article from the Communist News Network on that evil poisonous drug Ivermectin. Beware, it can cause GI upset! Of course they also talk about overdose symptoms. Anyone who takes enough of this to lead to OD symptoms has to be a complete “Maroon”. The local Justice of the Peace ratted out the old school country Doctor, when notified by some “Karen Whistleblower” county employee. What a F’ng asshole.

By Devon M. Sayers and Rebekah Riess, CNN 8/27/2021

The Arkansas Medical Board is investigating after a doctor said he prescribed an anti-parasitic drug “thousands” of times for treatment of Covid-19, including to inmates in an Arkansas jail.

The FDA has been warning against the use of ivermectin for treatment of Covid-19 since March. The drug is used to treat parasitic infections, primarily in livestock, and the CDC recently cautioned about an increase in reports to poison centers of severe illness caused by the drug.

Justice of the Peace Eva Madison raised the issue during a county budget hearing in Fayetteville on Tuesday, saying a county employee had told her the jail’s medical provider was prescribing ivermectin to treat and prevent Covid-19.

The county employee — who doesn’t work for the sheriff’s department — was directed to the jail to receive a Covid-19 test, Madison told CNN. During the visit he was prescribed ivermectin, which the Arkansas Department of Health also advises not to use to treat or prevent Covid-19.

“He is very afraid of retribution from the county and so he asked me to raise this issue on his behalf,” Madison said.

“Much to my surprise, he (the sheriff) defended the use. He defended the practice,” Madison said. The sheriff offered to put Madison in touch with the medical provider. Screen shots of the text exchange with the sheriff provided by Madison confirm her account.

Dr. Robert Karas provides medical services to the Washington County jail. He has been the contracted provider since 2015, according to Madison.

Madison said Karas defended his use of the drug during a phone conservation and again in a subsequent television interview after the practice came to light. Karas told television station KFSM that he began last October with prescribing the drug and has subsequently given it to family members and “thousands” of others. The doctor also recorded the station’s interview with his own camera and posted it online.

“Do you want us to try and fight like we’re at the beaches of Normandy? Or do you want me to tell what a lot of people do and say — oh, go home and ride it out and go to the ER when your lips turn blue,” Karas said.

Karas said that he started to use ivermectin in the jail population starting in November on “high-risk patients over 40.” The doctor defended his practice ,saying no deaths have been reported due to Covid-19 out of the 531 cases in the jail.

CNN called the Washington County Sheriff’s Office to confirm the number of Covid-19 patients treated at the jail and was referred back to Karas, since he is contracted to provide medical services. Calls to the doctor’s office have not been returned.

The Arkansas Medical Board has opened an investigation into the matter, Meg Mirivel, a spokesperson for the Arkansas Department of Health, told CNN. Due to the ongoing investigation the department was not able to comment further.

The sheriff’s department declined to comment further or provide additional information about inmate care.

The Sheriff’s office defended the practices to the local paper, saying all treatment is “voluntary.”

“They are able to refuse any medication they’re offered. Even with the vaccine, it’s all voluntary,” Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell told the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

“I believe it’s the county and the sheriff’s constitutional duty to provide the detainees adequate and appropriate medical care.” Madison told CNN.

“No one — including incarcerated individuals — should be subject to medical experimentation,” Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, said in a statement, adding that the sheriff “has a responsibility to provide food, shelter and safe, appropriate care to incarcerated people.”

In a CDC health advisory issued Thursday, the agency said the use of ivermectin can result in “gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Overdoses are associated with hypotension and neurologic effects such as decreased consciousness, confusion, hallucinations, seizures, coma, and death.”


Families are fleeing government-run schools



(REASON) – This fall may be the biggest moment of truth for public education since the 1970s.

After seeing enrollment in government-run K-12 schools decline by 3 percent in COVID-marred 2020–21 (including 13 percent for kindergarten and pre-K), all while homeschooling tripled, the $122 billion question facing this new school year is whether that defection is an aberration or inflection point. Given the amount of time that families have now had to plan around school-opening policies that have been among the most cautious in the developed world, would they choose their neighborhood school, or seek alternative solutions with more predictable schedules?

An early bellwether came clanging in last week, suggesting that the mass opting-out will be no mere blip. "Sadly, since the onset of the pandemic, our school roster has declined by 120 students who have left our school," Principal Elizabeth Garraway of Brooklyn's P.S. 118 Maurice Sendak elementary school emailed to parents in affluent Park Slope. "Due to the drastic decline in our numbers, our budget to pay teacher salaries was drastically reduced."

Read the full story ›

The post Families are fleeing government-run schools appeared first on WND.


Chilling: Vaccinated Australians to be granted new 'freedom' of 1 additional 'hour of recreation'



(SUMMIT NEWS) – In a chilling development, Australians in New South Wales, which includes the city of Sydney, are to be granted extra “freedom” if they are fully vaccinated, with residents allowed to “leave home for an hour of recreation on top of their exercise hour.”

9 News in Australia reports that “Premier Gladys Berejiklian said the vaccination milestone of six million reached this week would allow for a small renewal in freedoms for residents with the jab.”

The report add that “From September 13, households living in the NSW government’s LGAs of concern will be allowed to spend an additional hour of recreation outdoors, as long as all adults in the household are fully vaccinated.” It clarifies, “This is on top of the already-permitted hour of exercise, meaning households will be able to visit a park.”

Read the full story ›

The post Chilling: Vaccinated Australians to be granted new 'freedom' of 1 additional 'hour of recreation' appeared first on WND.


Chicago Judge Strips Mother Of Parental Rights For Being Unvaccinated

Chicago Judge Strips Mother Of Parental Rights For Being Unvaccinated

A few weeks ago, we shared the story of a 21-year-old man from Ohio who, after being arrested for fentanyl possession, was legally required by the judge overseeing his case to get vaccinated as a condition of his probation.

Now, in a terrifying glimpse of what might be in store for parents who refuse to vaccinate their kids, a judge in Cook County Illinois (which includes Chicago and some of the surrounding area) has taken away the parental rights of a woman due to her refusal to get vaccinated.

In what all parties agree is a very unusual and perhaps unprecedented step, a judge at Chicago's Daley Center has stripped Rebecca Firlit of custody due to her refusal to get vaccinated.

"I miss my son more than anything. It's been very difficult. I haven't seen him since Aug. 10," Firlit told a local Fox affiliate station in an interview.

That’s the day Firlit appeared in court via Zoom, accompanied by her ex-husband, for a child support hearing involving her 11-year-old son. The two have been divorced for seven years and share custody and parenting time. Out of the blue, Cook County Judge James Shapiro asked her whether she had been vaccinated. Firlit told Shapiro she didn't get vaccinated because she has had bad reactions to vaccines in the past.

Shapiro then ordered that Firlit be prevented from spending parenting time with her son until she gets vaccinated. Over the past two weeks, Firlit has been able to talk to her son on the phone and through video calls, but has been unable to see him in person.

"I think that it’s wrong. I think that it’s dividing families. And I think it’s not in my son's best interest to be away from his mother," Firlit said.

Firlit is now appealing the court order, saying the judge has no authority to take away her parenting rights over her vaccination status.

"It had nothing to do with what we were talking about. He was placing his views on me. And taking my son away from me," Firlit said.

Her attorney, Annette Fernholz, claimed the judge has overstepped his authority.

"In this case you have a judge, without any matter before him regarding the parenting time with the child deciding 'Oh, you’re not vaccinated. You don't get to see your child until you are vaccinated.' That kind of exceeds his jurisdiction," Fernholz said.

As she explained, the judge is acting completely on his own: Firlit's former husband didn't bring the issue before the court.

"You have to understand the father did not even bring this issue before the court. So it’s the judge on his own and making this decision that you can’t see your child until you’re vaccinated," Fernholz added.

However, the attorney representing Firlit's ex-husband, Jeffrey Leving, says they were also surprised by the judge's decision, but they support the ruling saying that given the pandemic, the child should be protected from an unvaccinated mother.

"There are children who have died because of COVID. I think every child should be safe. And I agree that the mother should be vaccinated," Leving said.

Since the start of the pandemic, fewer than 400 children in the US have died from COVID. In every case, the child had some kind of co-morbidity that dramatically complicated the situation.

The judge didn't respond to a request for comment. But it's worth noting that judges have broad authority, and this likely won't be the first time an American judge brings vaccination issues up during cases where it's not exactly relevant.

Tyler Durden Sat, 08/28/2021 - 16:00


CDC study: School mask mandates don't work


Amid the intense battle over mask mandates, New York magazine noted noted a large-scale study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that found no statistically significant difference in schools that required students to wear masks compared to schools where masks were optional.

The study analyzed some 90,000 elementary students in 169 Georgia schools from Nov. 16 to Dec. 11.

"The 21% lower incidence in schools that required mask use among students was not statistically significant compared with schools where mask use was optional," the CDC said.

"This finding might be attributed to higher effectiveness of masks among adults, who are at higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection but might also result from differences in mask-wearing behavior among students in schools with optional requirements."

New York magazine’s David Zweig pointed out that the findings, along with other mitigation efforts that have been shown to have statistically insignificant results, "cast doubt on the impact of many of the most common mitigation measures in American schools."

On Friday, meanwhile, COVID-19 data in Oregon showed the new statewide mask mandate has not flattened the rate of infection, according to a Oregon Health & Science University analysis.

"We’re seeing the number of people hospitalized going up at rates we’ve never seen before, said Peter Graven, the lead data scientist in OHSU's Business Intelligence unit, KDRV-TV in Medford reported.

"We had hoped to see the new statewide masking mandate make a difference in flattening the rate of infection, but we’re not seeing that yet," he said.

New York magazine noted that many European nations have exempted students from mask mandates, including the U.K., the Netherlands, France, Italy and the Scandinavian countries.

“Conspicuously, there’s no evidence of more outbreaks in schools in those countries relative to schools in the U.S., where the solid majority of kids wore masks for an entire academic year and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future," wrote Zweig.

"These countries, along with the World Health Organization, whose child-masking guidance differs substantially from the CDC's recommendations, have explicitly recognized that the decision to mask students carries with it potential academic and social harms for children and may lack a clear benefit."

The Foundation for Economic Education, which spotlighted the New York magazine story, commented that the CDC's findings "are not helpful to politicians and bureaucrats who continue to argue that students must be masked during school."

President Biden's top health advisor, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said during a recent panel discussion streamed online that whether students "are vaccinated or not, they need to wear a mask."

FEE noted that in the CDC's summary of its report -- which has received little media attention -- it neglected to include its finding that "required mask use among students was not statistically significant compared with schools where mask use was optional."

The Biden administration recently directed Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to employ "all of his oversight authorities and legal actions" against governors such as Ron DeSantis of Florida who have supported legislation to prevent schools from implementing mask mandates.

CDC statistics, meanwhile, show children generally do no spread COVID-19 and have little risk of any adverse effects. The seasonal flu is more deadly among children than COVID-19, and the swine flu one decade ago was six times more deadly.

The 2009-10 Swine Flu was 6x more deadly for children than 2020-21 Covid-19.

— Clarity (@covid_clarity) August 26, 2021

CDC used to say masks 'usually not recommended'

A recent study by the University of Louisville found that state mask mandates did not help slow the spread of COVID-19.

The researchers found that "masks may promote social cohesion as rallying symbols during a pandemic, but risk compensation can also occur."

Among the risks:

  • Prolonged mask use, more than four hours a day,
    "promotes facial alkalinization and inadvertently encourages dehydration, which in turn can enhance barrier breakdown and bacterial infection risk."
  • British clinicians have reported masks to increase headaches and sweating and decrease cognitive precision.
  • By obscuring nonverbal communication, masks interfere with social learning in children.
  • Likewise, masks can distort verbal speech and remove visual cues to the detriment of individuals with hearing loss.

The first large, randomized controlled trial of its kind showed no statistically significant difference in COVID-19 cases between people who wore masks and those who did not.

A study by the Centers for Disease Control in October indicated that Americans were adhering to mask mandates, but the requirements didn't appear to have slowed or stopped the spread of the coronavirus. And further, it found, mask-wearing has negative effects.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has compiled a page of "Mask Facts" showing that the consensus prior to the coronavirus pandemic was that the effectiveness of mask-wearing by the general public in slowing the spread of a virus is unproven, and there's evidence it does more harm than good.

The most recent CDC guidelines still recommend mask use for anyone 2 years or older in public settings and when around people who don’t live in their household.​ However, in March 2020, the CDC said masks "are usually not recommended" in "non-health care settings."

The same month, the World Health Organization recommended people not wear face masks unless they are sick with COVID-19 or caring for someone who is sick.

"There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there's some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly," said Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies program in March 2020.


In April, YouTube censored a video featuring an exchange hosted by Gov. Ron DeSantis featuring Oxford, Stanford and Harvard scholars saying children don't need masks.

YouTube didn't like an exchange in which Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff, responding to a question by DeSantis, said "children should not wear face masks, no. "

"They don’t need it for their own protection and they don’t need it for protecting other people, either," he said.

Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya said it is "developmentally inappropriate" for children to wear masks and it "just doesn’t help on the disease spread."

"I think it’s absolutely not the right thing to do," he said.

Bhattacharya said that "if we went back a year, a lot of experts would say that wearing masks for the general public is not evidence-based."

Later, Stanford's Scott Atlas said "there’s no scientific rationale or logic to have children wear masks in schools."

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact


The post CDC study: School mask mandates don't work appeared first on WND.


Vaccinated 5x More Likely to Die


Via Voxday


Hard evidence is coming in from the United Kingdom, and it conclusively establishes that the vaccines are NOT reducing the likelihood of a Covid-infected person dying.

The UK government just reported the following data, tucked away in their report on variants of concern:

Less than a third of delta variant deaths are in the unvaccinated.

Let me say that another way – two-thirds of Delta deaths in the UK are in the jabbed.

To be specific: From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths. Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.

Look at the bottom line: 402 deaths out of 47,008 cases in vaccinated; 253 deaths out of 151,054 cases in unvaccinated. If you get covid having been vaccinated, according to this data, you are much more likely to die than if you were not vaccinated!

Do the math. An unvaccinated individual in the UK who contracts COVID has a 1 in 597 chance of dying. A fully-vaccinated individual has a 1 in 117 chance of dying, which is 5.1 times greater.

The vaccines are clearly not effective, as they actually increase one’s risk of dying of Covid. And that doesn’t even account for the mounting evidence of serious adverse effects.


Friday, August 27, 2021







'This Ends The Debate' - Israeli Study Shows Natural Immunity 13x More Effective Than Vaccines At Stopping Delta

'This Ends The Debate' - Israeli Study Shows Natural Immunity 13x More Effective Than Vaccines At Stopping Delta

Dr. Anthony Fauci and the rest of President Biden's COVID advisors have been proven wrong about "the science" of COVID vaccines yet again. After telling Americans that vaccines offer better protection than natural infection, a new study out of Israel suggests the opposite is true: natural infection offers a much better shield against the delta variant than vaccines.

The study was described by Bloomberg as "the largest real-world analysis comparing natural immunity - gained from an earlier infection - to the protection provided by one of the most potent vaccines currently in use." A few days ago, we noted how remarkable it was that the mainstream press was finally giving voice to scientists to criticize President Biden's push to start doling out booster jabs. Well, this study further questions the credibility of relying on vaccines, given that the study showed that the vaccinated were ultimately 13x as likely to be infected as those who were infected previously, and 27x more likely to be symptomatic.

Alex Berenson, a science journalist who has repeatedly questioned the efficacy of vaccines and masks at preventing COVID, touted the study as enough to "end any debate over vaccines v natural immunity."

1/ Wow. New Israeli preprint shows natural immunity to #SARSCoV2 is FAR superior to the artificial kind - vaccinated people were 13x as likely to be infected and 27x to have symptomatic infections as a matched cohort that was previously infected. And this is with Delta dominant.

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

2/ The paper also shows that offering previously infected people one dose slightly reduced their infection risk (though not enough to outweigh side effects, I would argue). Along with the other emerging data, this paper should end any debate over vaccines v natural immunity…

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

3/ Source:

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

Here's an excerpt from a report by Science Magazine:

The new analysis relies on the database of Maccabi Healthcare Services, which enrolls about 2.5 million Israelis. The study, led by Tal Patalon and Sivan Gazit at KSM, the system’s research and innovation arm, found in two analyses that people who were vaccinated in January and February were, in June, July, and the first half of August, six to 13 times more likely to get infected than unvaccinated people who were previously infected with the coronavirus. In one analysis, comparing more than 32,000 people in the health system, the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 was 27 times higher among the vaccinated, and the risk of hospitalization eight times higher.

This time, the data leave little doubt that natural infection truly is the better option for protection against the delta variant, despite the fact that the US won't  acknowledge the already infected as having antibodies protecting them from the virus.

As the first country to achieve widepsread coverage by the vaccine, Israel is now in an unthinkable situation: daily case numbers have reached new record levels as the delta variant penetrates the vaccines' protection like a hot knife slicing through butter.

Source: Bloomberg

At the very least, the results of the study are good news for patients who have already successfully battled COVID but show the challenge of relying exclusively on immunizations to move past the pandemic.

"This analysis demonstrated that natural immunity affords longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization due to the delta variant," the researchers said.

Unfortunately, the study also showed that any protection is time-limited. Protection offered by natural infection wanes over time, just like the protection afforded by vaccines: The risk of a vaccine-breakthrough delta case was 13x higher than the risk of developing a second infection when the original illness occurred during January or February 2021. That's significantly more than the risk for people who were ill earlier in the outbreak.

What's more, giving a single shot of the vaccine to those who had been previously infected also appeared to boost their protection. Still, the data don't tell us anything about the long-term benefits of booster doses.

This latest data showing the vaccines don't offer anywhere near the 90%+ protection that was originally advertised by the FDA after the emergency authorization. Other studies are finding harmful side effects caused by the mRNA jabs are also more prevalent than previously believed.

Read the study pre-print below:

2021.08.24.21262415v1.full by Joseph Adinolfi Jr. on Scribd

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/27/2021 - 07:39


United Nations asked to intervene on behalf of Jan. 6 protesters


Outside during the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot (Wikimedia Commons)

The United Nations is being asked to intervene against the Joe Biden administration on behalf of protesters who were at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, and have been arrested and held in deplorable conditions ever since.

The request is coming from Matt Braynard, the executive director of Look Ahead America.

"Today I write in support of basic human rights for a specific group of Americans who have been disparately and inhumanely treated by their government – singled out, imprisoned, and even physically abused – because of their political beliefs," his complaint charges.

It is addressed to the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Council Branch complaints procedure unit.

His organization already has sought relief from "several members" of the government, as well as other human rights advocacy groups, but "we have been largely ignored, and human rights violations continue unabated, with no relief in sight."

The victims are about 80 political prisoners "unlawfully held and abused in custody throughout the United States of America because of alleged illegal activities occurring at the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021."

That's the day President Trump held a rally telling his supporters to "peacefully" protest against Congress' plan to adopt 2020 election results giving Joe Biden the White House.

A crowd of thousands ended up going to the building, and there were handsful among them that broke into the building and vandalized parts.

The congressional vote that day was on election results that were suspicious enough to draw lawsuits in dozens of states, and there continue to be audits, or plans for them, in several states.

What is not in question, however, is that local and state officials during the 2020 count violated the U.S. Constitution by arbitrarily ignoring or changing state laws regarding elections. The Constitution allows only state lawmakers to do that.

Further, that there were outside influences on those counts is without doubt, as leftist Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook wealth turned over some $350 million to mostly leftist election officials to help them "run" their operations.

The request for help seeks assistance from the U.N. in getting the U.S. government "to immediately release pretrial detainees, investigate and prosecute their abuse, and halt all further arrests and prosecutions pending a thorough and meaningful bipartisan investigation into the prosecution of protesters."

There were, the request notes, "a small number of people" who entered the building. "A small percentage of those individuals are now alleged to have engaged in violent criminal acts and/or destruction of property, while the overwhelming majority of rally attendees remained outside, lawfully and peacefully rallying, and largely oblivious to the events transpiring inside the Capitol."

To date, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, or entering the building with a firearm.

"Most of those arrested were not alleged to have committed any violent acts, theft, destruction, or looting," the request notes. Most, in fact, have been accused of "unlawful entry" or "disorderly conduct."

The request also was joined by Cara Castronuova, of the Citizens Against Political Persecution.

What really is happening with the extended detention and deprivations imposed on those suspects, the request notes, is that, "The left wing of the United States political machine has begun a purge of its opponents which runs unabated today. The United States government, specifically the U.S. Department of Justice and its many component offices and bureaus, ignore the U.S. and international law by and through its treatment of those who participated in a rally in support of freedom, fair elections, and right-wing conservative values.

"Those being hunted down and viciously punished through selective prosecutors, constitutional rights abuses, criminal law and procedure violations, and actual physical torture are victims of nothing less than an out-of-control political machine bent on annihilation of their supposed opponents."

The left-wing government activism that the request outlines previously was at work in the 2016 election, too, when operatives paid at least partly by Democrat presidential nominee and two-time race loser Hillary Clinton created the "Steele Dossier," a now-debunked document making wild and salacious claims against President Trump.

The FBI, in fact, submitted false information to a federal court in order to obtained permission to spy on the Trump campaign. A years-long special counsel investigation debunked the Democrat claims, and a special prosecutor now is reviewing what crimes may have been committed in pursuing that false narrative.

The rights complaint to the U.N. charges that Joe Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI chief Christopher Wray and acting U.S. Attorney Channing Phillips are responsible.

It explains the presumption of innocence is embedded in American law and there are procedures that must be followed in such cases.

"Moreover, everyone held by the government in custody, whether pretrial or post-conviction, and irrespective of the nature of the charges brought, is entitled to basic human rights and humane treatment."

But in this case, it explains, "through political malfeasance, deceit and the desire for revenge, the entirely of this system is derailed, and severe abuses are tolerated and even encouraged…"

The U.N. has acted previously in such situations, including when "many" were jailed in Cuba for their opposition to the government.

"The commission's excellent response to the Cuban detentions expresses some of the same urgent issues facing January 6 protesters," the request notes.

Among other problems, it cites the government's decision to prevent defendants – and the public – from seeing videos of that day, which could prove helpful to the defendants.

Multiple witnesses have confirmed the government's punishment of those not yet convicted of crimes, including "solitary confinement for long periods of time. They're being denied medical care. They're taking beatings. They're being denied sleep. They're being psychologically, emotionally, and physically tortured on a regular basis…"

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact



The post United Nations asked to intervene on behalf of Jan. 6 protesters appeared first on WND.


State says people fired for refusing vaccines generally can't collect jobless benefits



(OREGON LIVE) – The Oregon Employment Department said Wednesday that people who lose their jobs because they bucked a vaccine mandate probably aren’t eligible for unemployment assistance.

“In broad strokes, requiring somebody to be vaccinated during the midst of a worldwide pandemic is a reasonable policy,” David Gerstenfeld, acting director of the Oregon Employment Department, said on his weekly media call Wednesday.

“So, if somebody doesn’t follow that policy, and they don’t have a good reason, it very well could result in their not being eligible for benefits,” said Gerstenfeld, who is also an attorney. He said there are “narrow” exceptions for people with a medical exemption or a “sincerely held religious belief.”

Read the full story ›

The post State says people fired for refusing vaccines generally can't collect jobless benefits appeared first on WND.


No longer a conspiracy theory: Australia builds more quarantine camps



(CALDRON POOL) – The Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk announced on Thursday the state government’s plans to build a quarantine camp describing it as a “no-brainer.”

Palaszczuk made the announcement in a post on social media, saying the 1000-bed facility will be used to combat the “dangerous Delta variant.”

“A dedicated regional quarantine facility will be built at Wellcamp Airport near Toowoomba. As we contend with the dangerous Delta variant, we need fit-for-purpose quarantine facilities,” she said in a post on Twitter, adding, “Australia needs regional quarantine facilities to keep us safe. It’s a no-brainer.”

Read the full story ›

The post No longer a conspiracy theory: Australia builds more quarantine camps appeared first on WND.


US Intel Agency Has "Moderate" Confidence Covid Escaped From Wuhan Lab: Origins Report

US Intel Agency Has "Moderate" Confidence Covid Escaped From Wuhan Lab: Origins Report

An unclassified version of the US intelligence community's coronavirus origins report includes an assessment from one agency which has "moderate confidence" that Covid-19 emerged from a Chinese government lab in Wuhan, while four other agencies assessed with "low confidence" that the virus has a natural origin. The rest of the US intelligence community (which was awfully confident Donald Trump was working with Russia) declined to commit one way or another.

According to the Washington Examiner's Jerry Dunleavy:

The one unnamed spy agency leaning toward the Wuhan lab theory with moderate confidence said COVID-19’s emergence probably involved experimentation, animal handling, or sampling from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to an unclassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The four unnamed spy agencies, and the NIC, with low confidence in the natural origin hypothesis assessed that the initial infection was most likely from an animal infected with either COVID-19 or a close progenitor virus, with those analysts giving weight to China’s alleged lack of foreknowledge and the numerous vectors of potential natural exposure.

That said, US officials say a lack of cooperation from China has hampered efforts to get down to the truth. As Bloomberg notes, "China’s government was also uncertain about the virus’s origins, which was a reason Beijing didn’t cooperate."

The report also concludes that the virus was not engineered as a biological weapon, and most agencies assessed that it was not genetically engineered.

As we noted two days ago, Beijing threatened a "counterattack" if the report blamed China for the leak.

On Wednesday, with the Biden Administration report set to be released in a matter of days, a senior Chinese bureaucrat warned during a press conference that Beijing would "retaliate" if the intelligence report fingers a lab leak from the WHO.

"We will continue to cooperate with international organizations like the WHO in their research and in their search for the origins," said Fu Cong, director-general of the Foreign Ministry’s Arms Control Department. "But we do not accept baseless and unfounded accusations that are politically motivated. And if they want to baselessly accuse China, so they better be prepared to accept the counterattack from China."

It wasn't clear just how Beijing would retaliate: some speculated it could do so by sending even deadlier virus variants, or by intentionally closing down shipping ports.

By sending more variants? Or by intentionally closing down shipping ports??

— AGTrader (@ag_trader) August 25, 2021

After details of the report leaked on Wednesday, groups of scientists, activists and politicians said the inconclusive report demonstrated the need for further probes, according to the Washington Post.

"It is good they did that review, but I don’t think we should all move on just because it was inconclusive," said Anita Cicero, deputy director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. "I’m actually disturbed that much of the scientific and public health community seems complacent to make their best guesses and move on without getting to the root cause of the pandemic."

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/27/2021 - 16:00


What we’ve been seeing at the Pentagon over the past couple of weeks is a Secretary of Defense and a Joint Chiefs of Staff who clearly serve a Globalist master and who seem to hold America and the US Armed Services in contempt.




Thursday, August 26, 2021



The “Vaccinated” Are Still Panic-Stricken And Afraid “Science” Won’t Keep Up With Their Common Colds


First, let’s just start with a little piece of truth many don’t like to hear: If it’s science, it can be questioned. If it cannot be questioned, it’s propaganda. Guess where we’re at with the gene therapy shot? But it doesn’t matter.  Those who have taken the jab are still living in a  state of panic-stricken fear over the virus that hasn’t even proved to exist.

In fact, there’s more evidence to suggest the COVID-19 doesn’t exist (it’s a renaming of all respiratory colds, flu, and other illnesses) than there is to suggest that it does.  But that doesn’t matter, those who took the shot already are still afraid of their own shadow and worried that the “science” which is actually propaganda, won’t keep up with the invented scamdemic hoax.

In an article published by Bloomberg, a totalitarian rag, vaccinated people appear to be getting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate. Because of this, “there’s growing concern that vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to serious illness than previously thought,” writes Bloomberg. It’s still not a vaccine either by any definition of the term.  A quick dip into some critical thinking can prove that.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

But those who have taken the shots were assured they were going to be protected from the hoax, and they are still getting colds, so they are still scared.

The CDC ADMITS: PCR Tests CANNOT Differentiate Between Coronaviruses!

And the psyops continue, such as this one:

Fully “Vaccinated” Texas Governor Tests Positive For COVID-19

Absent clear public health messaging, vaccinated people are left confused about how to protect themselves. Just how vulnerable they are is a key variable not just for public health officials trying to figure out, say, when booster shots might be needed, but also to inform decisions about whether to roll back reopenings amid a new wave of the virus. –Bloomberg

Actually, the messaging is crystal clear.  Bloomberg is wrong. The messaging is “obey and comply. Get the shot when we say, and get the booster when we say. Do as your told and don’t act like the free human you were born as. You are our slaves and we will lock up forever if we see fit.”  That’s the undertone of all of the messaging coming from the ruling class and it’s been getting more authoritarian complete with punishments for disobedience.

Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY

“It’s quite clear that we have more breakthroughs now,” said Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco. “We all know someone who has had one. But we don’t have great clinical data.

One of the best-known outbreaks among vaccinated people occurred in the small beach town of Provincetown, Massachusetts, as thousands of vaccinated and unvaccinated alike gathered on dance floors and at house parties over the Fourth of July weekend to celebrate the holiday — and what seemed like a turning point in the pandemic. About three-fourths of the 469 infections were among vaccinated people. –Bloomberg

But what does all of this mean? It means the “vaccines” are working and more people should take them.

“The big picture here is that the vaccines are working and the reason for the spike in the U.S. is we have too little vaccine uptake,” said Tom Frieden, a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the head of the nonprofit Resolve to Save Lives. (Resolve to Slave Lives?)

Try not to laugh at the obvious propaganda.  It’s actually sad that some people are falling for this obvious lie of a narrative. We need more critical thinking and fewer egos on this planet.


The post The “Vaccinated” Are Still Panic-Stricken And Afraid “Science” Won’t Keep Up With Their Common Colds first appeared on SHTF Plan - When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.


YouTube Yanks Over 1 Million COVID-19 Videos It Deems ‘Dangerous’

YouTube has removed more than 1 million videos on its platform containing alleged misinformation related to COVID-19.


Vaccine Mandates & The "Great Reset"

Pressure on the unvaccinated grows. While the vaccinated in some countries are getting back some of their freedoms taken away by the covid interventions, the unvaccinated are not so well off. They are being targeted for discrimination.


Ultra-Vaxxed Israel’s Crisis Is a Dire Warning to America

JERUSALEM—The massive surge of COVID-19 infections in Israel, one of the most vaccinated countries on earth, is pointing to a complicated path ahead for America. In June, there were several days with zero new COVID infections in Israel.


FIFTEEN studies show natural immunity better than vaccines


President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris pose for a photo as they ride in the Presidential limousine from Emory University in Atlanta Friday, March 19, 2021, to Peachtree Dekalb Airport. (Official White House photo by Adam Schultz)

Many of the vaccine mandates being implemented in the wake of FDA approval of the Pfizer COVID vaccine make no exceptions for regular testing or proof of natural immunity through prior infection.

Biden's top health adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has claimed that the vaccines provide greater immunity. But the conventional wisdom prior to the pandemic and at least 15 scientific studies on COVID indicate the opposite.

The studies show, points out Daniel Horowitz in a column for the Blaze, "that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today."

Horowitz notes that even the Centers for Disease Control is conceding that immunity from the vaccines, particularly the Pfizer shot, is rapidly waning. A recent Mayo Clinic study, for example, found Pfizer's efficacy against infection is only 42%.

In contrast, studies show that prior infection provides near-perfect immunity, even against the delta variant.

Further, those who receive the experimental mRNA shots after having been infected with COVID are associated with 4.4 times increased odds of clinically significant side effects.

"Thus, it is as scandalous as it is unnecessary to vaccinate those with prior infection, even if one supports vaccination for those without prior immunity," Horowitz wrote.

Among the 15 studies is one by Washington University of St. Louis, published May 24 in the journal Nature.

"People who recover [even] from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades," the researchers said.

The study supports an in-vitro study in Singapore that found that people who were infected 17 years ago with SARS-1 had immunity against
SARS-CoV-2 -- or COVID-19 -- even if they never had COVID-19.

A study of 1,359 previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system found that not a single one was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic.

Another study, by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and Emory University in Atlanta published July 14 in Cell Medicine, found most recovered COVID patients produced durable antibodies.

They concluded "broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients."

A study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, published May 12 found that natural infection conveys much stronger mucosal immunity than being vaccinated.

"In fact," Horowitz pointed out, "studies now show that infected vaccinated people contain just as much viral load in their nasopharynx as those unvaccinated, a clearly unmistakable conclusion from the virus spreading wildly in many areas with nearly every adult vaccinated."

In a study published Sunday, Israeli researchers found that antibodies decreased much more slowly among those with prior infection than those who were vaccinated.

Irish researchers, in a paper published in Wiley Review on May 18, reviewed 11 cohort studies with more than 600,000 total recovered COVID patients who were followed up with over 10 months.

The key finding was that unlike the vaccine, after about four to six months, they found among those who had been naturally infected "no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time."

A Cornell University study published in the Lancet on April 27 found no evidence of a decrease in immunity for over seven months after being naturally infected.

Horowitz pointed out that "as early as March 27, among the many accurate statements Dr. Fauci made before he became a political animal, he declared he was 'really confident' in the immunity conferred by prior infection."

"That was long before 17 months of data and dozens of studies confirmed that," Horowitz wrote.

"Yet, today, there are thousands of doctors and nurses with infinitely better immunity than what the vaccines can confer who are losing their jobs during a staffing crisis for not getting the shots."

He concluded: "Just know that the big lie about natural immunity is perhaps the most verifiable lie, but it is likely not the only lie with devastating consequences we are being told about the virus, the vaccines, and alternative treatment options."

'People become immune by surviving infection'

In May, the Food and Drug Administration issued guidance stating a vaccine is still needed to confirm immunity from the COVID-19 virus.

The FDA said "antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and especially after a person has received a COVID-19 vaccination."

At the time, Yale University epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch pointed to the empirical study data contradicting that claim.

He pointed to a massive study in Israel finding that people who had tested positive for the novel coronavirus in the previous three or more months had at least as much protection against new infection, hospitalization and death as vaccinated people.

"People become immune by surviving infection," argued Risch, professor of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine.

In an email to WND in May, he explained that serum antibodies and T-cell antibodies – the white blood cells that attack infections – demonstrate past history of infection.

Risch said the FDA is correct that antibodies from infection are not the same as post-vaccination antibodies.

But this is irrelevant, he contended.

"These natural antibodies are proof of past infection," said Risch. "Past infection is extremely strong evidence of immunity."

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact


The post FIFTEEN studies show natural immunity better than vaccines appeared first on WND.


Wednesday, August 25, 2021

"Get The F*ck Out!": Antifa Attacks Female Reporter In Portland

"Get The F*ck Out!": Antifa Attacks Female Reporter In Portland

Authored by Matt Taibbi via TK News,

This past Sunday, while covering a protest in Portland, Oregon for our video partner News2Share, a reporter named Maranie Staab was attacked by members of an Antifa-affiliated group. After complaining about a report she’d done in Colombia in conjunction with TK News, they maced her, shot paint at her, and threw her to the ground.

The backdrop for this scene was explained to TK readers this past weekend in our latest episode of “Activism, Uncensored” called “The Great American Fistfight.” After a series of violent street clashes between left and right activists in Los Angeles, right-wing protesters planned a “United We Win” rally in Portland, Oregon for this past weekend. Antifa and left-wing groups pledged to “defend Portland from racist fascists.” News2Share’s Ford Fischer predicted violence, and he unfortunately turned out to be right.

The exact sequence of events will be detailed in a longer report Ford has coming — the whole day turned out to be a mess, replete with violent confrontations and ending with an exchange of gunfire, in which a right-wing protester fired first (a Black Bloc protester returned fire but was not apprehended). Staab, it should be noted, was also first sprayed with WD-40 by a right-wing protester. But the more serious incident took place later.

In the relevant sequence, an Antifa-affiliated protester called Staab a kutta (a Hindi word meaning, “dog,” apparently) and “slut.” Then the masked protester demanded that press “get the fuck out” and stop filming, pointing in Staab’s face and making the following bizarre comment about a story we ran in July called “Colombia in Chaos”:

You fucking endanger people by flying to fucking Colombia and endangering everyone by opening them up to Covid!

Beyond the total incoherence of that comment generally, calling a woman a name like “slut” obviously flies in the face of what antifascist protesters generally claim to be their beliefs about things like misogyny. In any case, Staab then approached the protesters without her cameras out to try to talk things through, at which point they tossed paint at her, maced her, and threw her to the ground. Eventually, they also smashed both her iPhone and the lens for her digital camera. “Out!” they screamed. “How many fucking times do we have to tell you?”

In the coming longer video report on this site, viewers will see that the idiocies of Sunday ranged far and wide, with no shortage of violence from the Proud Boys and other rightist groups that showed up that day. However, only one group saw fit to attack a videographer, and I think it’s time the wider press took more notice, because this is not an aberration with this type of activist.

Having encountered Antifa-type protesters in the past, my impression was always that they were neither organized nor terribly numerous, and I always found them more ridiculous than threatening. I too have had the experience of being ordered not to photograph or film Antifa protesters, instructions that always made me wonder about the intelligence level of these people.

Yes, putting masks on prevents you from being identified, but it doesn’t confer the right of invisibility. Also, if you show up at a publicly-announced protest in a public place in broad daylight dressed like GWAR roadies or extras to a Terry Gilliam movie and start smashing things, one really has to wonder about the sincerity of your commitment to anonymity. Someone is going to film you, whether it’s the right-wing counter-protesters on the other side or the police, and in the case of the press, it’s actually their job to do it in a responsible way. You have a right to wear a mask, they have both the right and the obligation to film you, that’s how this works.

Nonetheless, antifascist protesters have taken their absurd demands of non-coverage quite far in the past, making lists of protester-approved media and going after reporters and videographers from papers like local CBS and ABC affiliates as well as the Washington Post, NPR, the Toronto Sun, and others. Their rationale is that filming hurts their cause by making them vulnerable either to arrest or doxing, a dubious concept one could argue on multiple levels, but again, that’s what masks are for. Moreover — and I know this can be a hard concept — cameras generally help public protests, with the exception being when activists behave stupidly or unattractively in public. If you don’t do things like knock female reporters to the ground, you’re probably not going to end up dealing with negative press.

By general assent many mainstream outlets and politicians have taken the position that “Antifa” doesn’t exist, with outlets like Vanity Fair writing pieces like “Sure looks like the right’s Antifa boogeyman doesn’t exist,” and people like Jerrold Nadler calling Antifa violence a “myth.” It does seem to be true that there is no “Antifa” in the sense of a nationally organized phenomenon, and they certainly are not the threat Donald Trump claims they are, but that doesn’t mean they are a completely harmless non-entity either. Too many news outlets have respected the desire of such protesters to remain invisible when they behave atrociously, and this is one of those cases.

If the protesters from this past weekend had any integrity, they would come forward and start with an apology. There’s no excuse for attacking press, especially when your modus operandi is moronic attention-grabbing public stunts. I’ll let Ford and News2Share tell the rest of this story, but to say I’m furious about the events of this weekend would be an understatement. It also doesn’t say a lot about the ethics of mainstream press outlets that they let behavior like this go without comment. How is any of this “progressive”?

Tyler Durden Wed, 08/25/2021 - 21:00


Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray Reduces Covid-19 Viral Load By 95% Within 24 Hours: Study

Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray Reduces Covid-19 Viral Load By 95% Within 24 Hours: Study

A well known antimicrobial, Nitric Oxide, has been found to rapidly reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load, knocking it down by 95% within 24 hours, and 99% within 72 hours, according to a recent study by researchers funded by England's NHS foundation trust and SaNOtize Research & Development Corporation - a Canadian biotech company currently conducting Phase II trials of a nitric oxide nasal spray.

A group of 80 adults (18-70 years) with confirmed (Alpha strain) Covid-19 infections were divided into two groups, with half receiving nitric oxide nasal spray (NONS) that were self-administered 5-6 times daily for 9 days.

The goal of the nasal spray is to kill the virus present in the upper airways - preventing it from incubating and making its way to the lungs.

The study found that mean viral load was significantly lower in the NONS group by a factor of 16.2, in what the study's authors described as an "accelerated decrease," while nearly half of those who completed a post-study questionnaire reported feeling better vs. 8% of the placebo group.

Mean SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration was lower on NONS by a factor of 16.2 at days 2 and 4. A rapid reduction (95%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load was observed within 24 hours, with a 99% reduction observed within 72 hours with NONS treatments. -Clinical efficacy of nitric oxide nasal spray (NONS) for the treatment of mild COVID-19 infection.

What's more, there were no serious adverse reactions from the nasal spray.

"Treatment with NONS in this trial was found to be effective and safe in reducing the viral load in patients with mild, symptomatic COVID-19 infection," reads the study. "Patients in the NONS treatment arm demonstrated viral loads, as determined from PCR testing of nose and throat swab sampling, that were lower at days 2 and 4 by a factor of 16.2 than those on placebo, and symptom resolution was also found to be faster on NONS treatment than on placebo in this study."

Lower SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads in patients with NONS may be beneficial in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. It has been described that higher viral loads in patients with SARS-CoV-2 earlier than SARS-CoV may have contributed to greater difficulties in reducing the onward transmission. Furthermore, it has been observed that the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 was associated with the SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels of contacts and incubation time was shortened in a dose-dependent manner.

Accelerated SARS-CoV-2 clearance with NONS may reduce symptom duration, decrease infectivity period, reduce hospital admissions, and lower disease severity. Consequently, this study could be used as supporting evidence for emergency use of NONS for patients with mild COVID-19 infection.

According to SaNOtize, researchers from Utah State University were able to kill 99.9% of SARS-CoV-2 in a petri dish within two minutes.

The company, whose board includes Prof. Ferid Murad of Stanford University - who won the Nobel Prize in 1998 for discovering the properties of nitric oxide, signed an agreement with Indian biotech Glenmark earlier this month to manufacture, market and distribute NONS throughout Asia, including Singapore, Malaysia Hong Kong, Taiwan, Nepal, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste and Vietnam.

According to SaNOtize Chief Science Officer, Dr. Chris Miller, the nasal spray is a 'post-exposure' prevention akin to hand sanitizer.

"If you are outside, around people, and could be infected, you could use the spray and reduce the number of viruses in the nose, before it is becoming a full-blown infection. We have shown that even when people have a very high load of virus, the spray can significantly reduce the viral load," Miller said in May.

Tyler Durden Wed, 08/25/2021 - 22:00


Did FDA really approve the Pfizer COVID vaccine? Wait. What?

The pressure is building. “Take the vaccine.” Many people are looking for a successful way to refuse the COVID vaccine in situations where the shots are mandated. I fully support such efforts.




Tuesday, August 24, 2021

Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.


EXCLUSIVE: Washington public school forces unvaccinated teens to wear ankle monitors

According to her mother who spoke anonymously to The Post Millennial, her daughter was at a practice for the public school's volleyball team and texted her that she was being asked to put on an ankle monitor. The teen did not answer the mother's follow up texts or calls.


Governments' COVID 'scaremongering' has allowed 'fear to win over truth': Alan Jones

Sky News host Alan Jones says half of the nation is "tragically" locked up in their own homes "terrified" because of the alarmism of "moronic officialdom" who have got no other way of dealing with COVID. "Governments around Australia can boast one triumph – their scare mongering has worked," Mr


Kim Iversen: Joe Rogan BLASTS Fauci For FLIP-FLOPPING, Ruining Public Trust In Health Experts

Kim Iversen reacts to Joe Rogan's comments on Dr. Anthony Fauci. About Rising: Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutt


‘Don’t march, don’t protest’: Alan Jones calls for Australians in lockdown to obey the law

Sky News host Alan Jones has called for people to not participate in any illegal protests following the scenes across major cities on the weekend. Mr Jones assessed the recent anti-lockdown protests and said, “at no stage” has he ever “condoned anything that is illegal.” “And certainly n


100 Million Vaccine-Hesitant Americans Will Get The Shot Now That A Government Agency Said It’s OK

U.S.—100 million Americans who were previously hesitant to get vaccinated are rejoicing today after the FDA approved it, proving that everything is totally safe.


Injection Resistance Is a Class Thing

It’s not often that I’d feel compelled to share a full reader email. I get a lot of emails… and let’s just say the quality can vary. But here’s an extremely high-quality email that’s worth reproducing.


Oxford University study finds fully vaccinated Healthcare workers carry 251 times viral load compared to the unvaccinated proving the Covid-19 jabs make you worse

A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.


CHD Wins Case Against FCC on Safety for 5G and Wireless


Children's Health Defense (CHD) won its historic case today against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a case challenging the agency's decision not to review its 1996 health and safety guidelines regarding wireless-based technologies including 5G. Watch our press event which was held on Monday, Aug. 16 at 10 a.m. PT/1 p.m. ET.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit published its decision Aug.13. The court ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its 1996 radiofrequency emission guidelines protect the public's health. The court's judgment states:

"The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation …"

CHD Chairman and attorney on the case Robert F Kennedy, Jr. said:

"The court's decision exposes the FCC and FDA as captive agencies that have abandoned their duty to protect public health in favor of a single-minded crusade to increase telecom industry profits."

CHD's case was consolidated with another similar case that was filed by the Environmental Health Trust. The organizations filed joint briefs in the case. CHD's lead attorney for the case, Scott McCollough, a telecommunication and administrative law attorney who represented the petitioners in the hearing, said:

"This is an historic win. The FCC will have to re-open the proceeding and for the first time meaningfully and responsibly confront the vast amount of scientific and medical evidence showing that current guidelines do not adequately protect health and the environment."

The court's decision continued to say:

"… the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment … The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms."

The petitioners in the case filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology which the FCC ignored, including evidence of already existing widespread sickness. Attorney Dafna Tachover, CHD's director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project, who initiated and led the case for CHD, said:

"The FCC will finally have to recognize the immense suffering by the millions of people who have already been harmed by the FCC's and FDA's unprecedented failure to protect public health. Finally the truth is out. I am hopeful that following this decision, the FCC will do the right thing and halt any further deployment of 5G."

The court ruling was a two-to-one panel decision. Judge Robert Wilkins wrote the majority opinion. Judge Patricia Millett joined him and Judge Karen Henderson, who presided over the panel, issued a dissent. CHD President Mary Holland said:

"The U.S. Court of Appeals decision in CHD's case against the FCC reaffirms my faith in the judiciary. In these chaotic days, courts can still hold out the hope for sober-minded decisions according to the rule of law. I eagerly await FCC action in compliance with the court's ruling."

This historic case was filed by CHD on Feb. 2, 2020. The case challenged the agency's decision not to review its 25-year-old radio-frequency emissions (RF) guidelines which regulate the radiation emitted by wireless technology devices (such as cell phones and iPads) and infrastructure (cell towers, Wi-Fi and smart-meters), and to promulgate biologically and evidence-based guidelines that adequately protect public health.

In 1996, the FCC adopted guidelines which only protect consumers from adverse effects occurring at levels of radiation that cause thermal effects (temperature change in tissue), while ignoring substantial evidence of profound harms from pulsed and modulated RF radiation at non-thermal levels. The FCC hasn't reviewed its guidelines or the evidence since, despite clear scientific evidence of harm and growing rates of RF-related sickness.

In 2012, the Government Accountability Office of Congress published a report recommending the FCC reassess its guidelines. As a result, in 2013 the FCC published an inquiry to decide whether the guidelines should be reviewed. It opened docket 13-84 for the public to file comments.

Thousands of comments and scientific evidence by scientists, medical organizations and doctors, as well as hundreds of comments by people who have become sick from this radiation were filed in support of new rules. Nevertheless, on Dec. 4, 2019, the FCC closed the docket and published its decision, affirming the adequacy of its guidelines without proper assessment of the comments or the evidence.

The lawsuit, called a Petition for Review, contends that the agency's decision is arbitrary, capricious, not evidence-based, an abuse of discretion and in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

CHD's lawsuit was joined by nine individual petitioners. Petitioners include Professor David Carpenter MD, a world-renowned scientist and public health expert who is co-editor of the BioInitiative Report, the most comprehensive review of the science on RF effects; physicians who see the sickness caused by wireless radiation in their clinics; and a mother whose son died of a cell phone-related brain tumor.

CHD's lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. However it was transferred to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit where it was joined with a similar lawsuit filed by the Environmental Health Trust and Consumers for Safe Cell Phones. The main brief and the reply brief were filed jointly by all petitioners.



Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concerns

On a sweltering July day in 2010, seven medical researchers and one patient advocate gathered in a plush Marriott hotel in College Park, Maryland, to review a promising drug designed to prevent heart attacks and strokes by limiting blood clotting.


Here, Hold My Woo 2


Clif High says that whatever angst level you’re feeling now, it will be much higher in 30 days, due to the storm of information that will be coming out between now and October 1st.

The Pfizer vaxx has now been FDA-approved but nothing has legally changed. The Deep State is still trying to force your employer to murder you via the clot shot because not even the vaunted FDA approval can make forced vaccinations legal.

The FDA approved the Pfizer shot without any public meetings or any adverse events taken into account, knowing full well that officially, there have been over 13,000 people killed in the US (or likely, 10- to 100 times more than this) by the shots over the past 7 months.

Clif says, “The FDA is not going to rescue you. Trump is not going to rescue you…It’s necessary that you basically man-up, at this point and start fighting back…Devolution does not require Trump…

“Devolution is a process that involves the military and the populace devolving away from the captured government, in order to isolate the captured government and let it collapse. That process is happening now.”

The Arizona audit reports will have the effect of delegitimizing Biden-Harris both domestically and internationally and the war that has been bubbling just beneath the surface for so long will go dynamic in September, according to Cliff’s data. “By dynamic, you’ll see an entirely different aspect of the relationship of the parties in this war.”

By the end of this week, he believes that that the Mainstream Media is going to be overwhelmed with so much bad news that puts the Deep State in a bad light, that they can’t even attempt to fend it off, anymore.

He says the whole point of everything that’s going on is for everybody to see the Deep State, because once we can see, it, we can dismantle it.

Contributed by Alexandra Bruce