The “Vaccinated” Are Still Panic-Stricken And Afraid “Science” Won’t Keep Up With Their Common Colds

ORIGINAL LINK

First, let’s just start with a little piece of truth many don’t like to hear: If it’s science, it can be questioned. If it cannot be questioned, it’s propaganda. Guess where we’re at with the gene therapy shot? But it doesn’t matter.  Those who have taken the jab are still living in a  state of panic-stricken fear over the virus that hasn’t even proved to exist.

In fact, there’s more evidence to suggest the COVID-19 doesn’t exist (it’s a renaming of all respiratory colds, flu, and other illnesses) than there is to suggest that it does.  But that doesn’t matter, those who took the shot already are still afraid of their own shadow and worried that the “science” which is actually propaganda, won’t keep up with the invented scamdemic hoax.

In an article published by Bloomberg, a totalitarian rag, vaccinated people appear to be getting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate. Because of this, “there’s growing concern that vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to serious illness than previously thought,” writes Bloomberg. It’s still not a vaccine either by any definition of the term.  A quick dip into some critical thinking can prove that.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

But those who have taken the shots were assured they were going to be protected from the hoax, and they are still getting colds, so they are still scared.

The CDC ADMITS: PCR Tests CANNOT Differentiate Between Coronaviruses!

And the psyops continue, such as this one:

Fully “Vaccinated” Texas Governor Tests Positive For COVID-19

Absent clear public health messaging, vaccinated people are left confused about how to protect themselves. Just how vulnerable they are is a key variable not just for public health officials trying to figure out, say, when booster shots might be needed, but also to inform decisions about whether to roll back reopenings amid a new wave of the virus. –Bloomberg

Actually, the messaging is crystal clear.  Bloomberg is wrong. The messaging is “obey and comply. Get the shot when we say, and get the booster when we say. Do as your told and don’t act like the free human you were born as. You are our slaves and we will lock up forever if we see fit.”  That’s the undertone of all of the messaging coming from the ruling class and it’s been getting more authoritarian complete with punishments for disobedience.

Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY

“It’s quite clear that we have more breakthroughs now,” said Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco. “We all know someone who has had one. But we don’t have great clinical data.

One of the best-known outbreaks among vaccinated people occurred in the small beach town of Provincetown, Massachusetts, as thousands of vaccinated and unvaccinated alike gathered on dance floors and at house parties over the Fourth of July weekend to celebrate the holiday — and what seemed like a turning point in the pandemic. About three-fourths of the 469 infections were among vaccinated people. –Bloomberg

But what does all of this mean? It means the “vaccines” are working and more people should take them.

“The big picture here is that the vaccines are working and the reason for the spike in the U.S. is we have too little vaccine uptake,” said Tom Frieden, a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the head of the nonprofit Resolve to Save Lives. (Resolve to Slave Lives?)

Try not to laugh at the obvious propaganda.  It’s actually sad that some people are falling for this obvious lie of a narrative. We need more critical thinking and fewer egos on this planet.

 

The post The “Vaccinated” Are Still Panic-Stricken And Afraid “Science” Won’t Keep Up With Their Common Colds first appeared on SHTF Plan - When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

YouTube Yanks Over 1 Million COVID-19 Videos It Deems ‘Dangerous’

YouTube has removed more than 1 million videos on its platform containing alleged misinformation related to COVID-19.

ORIGINAL LINK

Vaccine Mandates & The "Great Reset"

Pressure on the unvaccinated grows. While the vaccinated in some countries are getting back some of their freedoms taken away by the covid interventions, the unvaccinated are not so well off. They are being targeted for discrimination.

ORIGINAL LINK

Ultra-Vaxxed Israel’s Crisis Is a Dire Warning to America

JERUSALEM—The massive surge of COVID-19 infections in Israel, one of the most vaccinated countries on earth, is pointing to a complicated path ahead for America. In June, there were several days with zero new COVID infections in Israel.

ORIGINAL LINK

FIFTEEN studies show natural immunity better than vaccines

ORIGINAL LINK

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris pose for a photo as they ride in the Presidential limousine from Emory University in Atlanta Friday, March 19, 2021, to Peachtree Dekalb Airport. (Official White House photo by Adam Schultz)

Many of the vaccine mandates being implemented in the wake of FDA approval of the Pfizer COVID vaccine make no exceptions for regular testing or proof of natural immunity through prior infection.

Biden's top health adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has claimed that the vaccines provide greater immunity. But the conventional wisdom prior to the pandemic and at least 15 scientific studies on COVID indicate the opposite.

The studies show, points out Daniel Horowitz in a column for the Blaze, "that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today."

Horowitz notes that even the Centers for Disease Control is conceding that immunity from the vaccines, particularly the Pfizer shot, is rapidly waning. A recent Mayo Clinic study, for example, found Pfizer's efficacy against infection is only 42%.

In contrast, studies show that prior infection provides near-perfect immunity, even against the delta variant.

Further, those who receive the experimental mRNA shots after having been infected with COVID are associated with 4.4 times increased odds of clinically significant side effects.

"Thus, it is as scandalous as it is unnecessary to vaccinate those with prior infection, even if one supports vaccination for those without prior immunity," Horowitz wrote.

Among the 15 studies is one by Washington University of St. Louis, published May 24 in the journal Nature.

"People who recover [even] from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades," the researchers said.

The study supports an in-vitro study in Singapore that found that people who were infected 17 years ago with SARS-1 had immunity against
SARS-CoV-2 -- or COVID-19 -- even if they never had COVID-19.

A study of 1,359 previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system found that not a single one was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic.

Another study, by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and Emory University in Atlanta published July 14 in Cell Medicine, found most recovered COVID patients produced durable antibodies.

They concluded "broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients."

A study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, published May 12 found that natural infection conveys much stronger mucosal immunity than being vaccinated.

"In fact," Horowitz pointed out, "studies now show that infected vaccinated people contain just as much viral load in their nasopharynx as those unvaccinated, a clearly unmistakable conclusion from the virus spreading wildly in many areas with nearly every adult vaccinated."

In a study published Sunday, Israeli researchers found that antibodies decreased much more slowly among those with prior infection than those who were vaccinated.

Irish researchers, in a paper published in Wiley Review on May 18, reviewed 11 cohort studies with more than 600,000 total recovered COVID patients who were followed up with over 10 months.

The key finding was that unlike the vaccine, after about four to six months, they found among those who had been naturally infected "no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time."

A Cornell University study published in the Lancet on April 27 found no evidence of a decrease in immunity for over seven months after being naturally infected.

Horowitz pointed out that "as early as March 27, among the many accurate statements Dr. Fauci made before he became a political animal, he declared he was 'really confident' in the immunity conferred by prior infection."

"That was long before 17 months of data and dozens of studies confirmed that," Horowitz wrote.

"Yet, today, there are thousands of doctors and nurses with infinitely better immunity than what the vaccines can confer who are losing their jobs during a staffing crisis for not getting the shots."

He concluded: "Just know that the big lie about natural immunity is perhaps the most verifiable lie, but it is likely not the only lie with devastating consequences we are being told about the virus, the vaccines, and alternative treatment options."

'People become immune by surviving infection'

In May, the Food and Drug Administration issued guidance stating a vaccine is still needed to confirm immunity from the COVID-19 virus.

The FDA said "antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and especially after a person has received a COVID-19 vaccination."

At the time, Yale University epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch pointed to the empirical study data contradicting that claim.

He pointed to a massive study in Israel finding that people who had tested positive for the novel coronavirus in the previous three or more months had at least as much protection against new infection, hospitalization and death as vaccinated people.

"People become immune by surviving infection," argued Risch, professor of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine.

In an email to WND in May, he explained that serum antibodies and T-cell antibodies – the white blood cells that attack infections – demonstrate past history of infection.

Risch said the FDA is correct that antibodies from infection are not the same as post-vaccination antibodies.

But this is irrelevant, he contended.

"These natural antibodies are proof of past infection," said Risch. "Past infection is extremely strong evidence of immunity."

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

The post FIFTEEN studies show natural immunity better than vaccines appeared first on WND.

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

"Get The F*ck Out!": Antifa Attacks Female Reporter In Portland

ORIGINAL LINK
"Get The F*ck Out!": Antifa Attacks Female Reporter In Portland

Authored by Matt Taibbi via TK News,

This past Sunday, while covering a protest in Portland, Oregon for our video partner News2Share, a reporter named Maranie Staab was attacked by members of an Antifa-affiliated group. After complaining about a report she’d done in Colombia in conjunction with TK News, they maced her, shot paint at her, and threw her to the ground.

The backdrop for this scene was explained to TK readers this past weekend in our latest episode of “Activism, Uncensored” called “The Great American Fistfight.” After a series of violent street clashes between left and right activists in Los Angeles, right-wing protesters planned a “United We Win” rally in Portland, Oregon for this past weekend. Antifa and left-wing groups pledged to “defend Portland from racist fascists.” News2Share’s Ford Fischer predicted violence, and he unfortunately turned out to be right.

The exact sequence of events will be detailed in a longer report Ford has coming — the whole day turned out to be a mess, replete with violent confrontations and ending with an exchange of gunfire, in which a right-wing protester fired first (a Black Bloc protester returned fire but was not apprehended). Staab, it should be noted, was also first sprayed with WD-40 by a right-wing protester. But the more serious incident took place later.

In the relevant sequence, an Antifa-affiliated protester called Staab a kutta (a Hindi word meaning, “dog,” apparently) and “slut.” Then the masked protester demanded that press “get the fuck out” and stop filming, pointing in Staab’s face and making the following bizarre comment about a story we ran in July called “Colombia in Chaos”:

You fucking endanger people by flying to fucking Colombia and endangering everyone by opening them up to Covid!

Beyond the total incoherence of that comment generally, calling a woman a name like “slut” obviously flies in the face of what antifascist protesters generally claim to be their beliefs about things like misogyny. In any case, Staab then approached the protesters without her cameras out to try to talk things through, at which point they tossed paint at her, maced her, and threw her to the ground. Eventually, they also smashed both her iPhone and the lens for her digital camera. “Out!” they screamed. “How many fucking times do we have to tell you?”

In the coming longer video report on this site, viewers will see that the idiocies of Sunday ranged far and wide, with no shortage of violence from the Proud Boys and other rightist groups that showed up that day. However, only one group saw fit to attack a videographer, and I think it’s time the wider press took more notice, because this is not an aberration with this type of activist.

Having encountered Antifa-type protesters in the past, my impression was always that they were neither organized nor terribly numerous, and I always found them more ridiculous than threatening. I too have had the experience of being ordered not to photograph or film Antifa protesters, instructions that always made me wonder about the intelligence level of these people.

Yes, putting masks on prevents you from being identified, but it doesn’t confer the right of invisibility. Also, if you show up at a publicly-announced protest in a public place in broad daylight dressed like GWAR roadies or extras to a Terry Gilliam movie and start smashing things, one really has to wonder about the sincerity of your commitment to anonymity. Someone is going to film you, whether it’s the right-wing counter-protesters on the other side or the police, and in the case of the press, it’s actually their job to do it in a responsible way. You have a right to wear a mask, they have both the right and the obligation to film you, that’s how this works.

Nonetheless, antifascist protesters have taken their absurd demands of non-coverage quite far in the past, making lists of protester-approved media and going after reporters and videographers from papers like local CBS and ABC affiliates as well as the Washington Post, NPR, the Toronto Sun, and others. Their rationale is that filming hurts their cause by making them vulnerable either to arrest or doxing, a dubious concept one could argue on multiple levels, but again, that’s what masks are for. Moreover — and I know this can be a hard concept — cameras generally help public protests, with the exception being when activists behave stupidly or unattractively in public. If you don’t do things like knock female reporters to the ground, you’re probably not going to end up dealing with negative press.

By general assent many mainstream outlets and politicians have taken the position that “Antifa” doesn’t exist, with outlets like Vanity Fair writing pieces like “Sure looks like the right’s Antifa boogeyman doesn’t exist,” and people like Jerrold Nadler calling Antifa violence a “myth.” It does seem to be true that there is no “Antifa” in the sense of a nationally organized phenomenon, and they certainly are not the threat Donald Trump claims they are, but that doesn’t mean they are a completely harmless non-entity either. Too many news outlets have respected the desire of such protesters to remain invisible when they behave atrociously, and this is one of those cases.

If the protesters from this past weekend had any integrity, they would come forward and start with an apology. There’s no excuse for attacking press, especially when your modus operandi is moronic attention-grabbing public stunts. I’ll let Ford and News2Share tell the rest of this story, but to say I’m furious about the events of this weekend would be an understatement. It also doesn’t say a lot about the ethics of mainstream press outlets that they let behavior like this go without comment. How is any of this “progressive”?

Tyler Durden Wed, 08/25/2021 - 21:00

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray Reduces Covid-19 Viral Load By 95% Within 24 Hours: Study

ORIGINAL LINK
Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray Reduces Covid-19 Viral Load By 95% Within 24 Hours: Study

A well known antimicrobial, Nitric Oxide, has been found to rapidly reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load, knocking it down by 95% within 24 hours, and 99% within 72 hours, according to a recent study by researchers funded by England's NHS foundation trust and SaNOtize Research & Development Corporation - a Canadian biotech company currently conducting Phase II trials of a nitric oxide nasal spray.

A group of 80 adults (18-70 years) with confirmed (Alpha strain) Covid-19 infections were divided into two groups, with half receiving nitric oxide nasal spray (NONS) that were self-administered 5-6 times daily for 9 days.

The goal of the nasal spray is to kill the virus present in the upper airways - preventing it from incubating and making its way to the lungs.

The study found that mean viral load was significantly lower in the NONS group by a factor of 16.2, in what the study's authors described as an "accelerated decrease," while nearly half of those who completed a post-study questionnaire reported feeling better vs. 8% of the placebo group.

Mean SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration was lower on NONS by a factor of 16.2 at days 2 and 4. A rapid reduction (95%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load was observed within 24 hours, with a 99% reduction observed within 72 hours with NONS treatments. -Clinical efficacy of nitric oxide nasal spray (NONS) for the treatment of mild COVID-19 infection.

What's more, there were no serious adverse reactions from the nasal spray.

"Treatment with NONS in this trial was found to be effective and safe in reducing the viral load in patients with mild, symptomatic COVID-19 infection," reads the study. "Patients in the NONS treatment arm demonstrated viral loads, as determined from PCR testing of nose and throat swab sampling, that were lower at days 2 and 4 by a factor of 16.2 than those on placebo, and symptom resolution was also found to be faster on NONS treatment than on placebo in this study."

Lower SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads in patients with NONS may be beneficial in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. It has been described that higher viral loads in patients with SARS-CoV-2 earlier than SARS-CoV may have contributed to greater difficulties in reducing the onward transmission. Furthermore, it has been observed that the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 was associated with the SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels of contacts and incubation time was shortened in a dose-dependent manner.

Accelerated SARS-CoV-2 clearance with NONS may reduce symptom duration, decrease infectivity period, reduce hospital admissions, and lower disease severity. Consequently, this study could be used as supporting evidence for emergency use of NONS for patients with mild COVID-19 infection.

According to SaNOtize, researchers from Utah State University were able to kill 99.9% of SARS-CoV-2 in a petri dish within two minutes.

The company, whose board includes Prof. Ferid Murad of Stanford University - who won the Nobel Prize in 1998 for discovering the properties of nitric oxide, signed an agreement with Indian biotech Glenmark earlier this month to manufacture, market and distribute NONS throughout Asia, including Singapore, Malaysia Hong Kong, Taiwan, Nepal, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste and Vietnam.

According to SaNOtize Chief Science Officer, Dr. Chris Miller, the nasal spray is a 'post-exposure' prevention akin to hand sanitizer.

"If you are outside, around people, and could be infected, you could use the spray and reduce the number of viruses in the nose, before it is becoming a full-blown infection. We have shown that even when people have a very high load of virus, the spray can significantly reduce the viral load," Miller said in May.

Tyler Durden Wed, 08/25/2021 - 22:00

via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK

Did FDA really approve the Pfizer COVID vaccine? Wait. What?

The pressure is building. “Take the vaccine.” Many people are looking for a successful way to refuse the COVID vaccine in situations where the shots are mandated. I fully support such efforts.

ORIGINAL LINK

FDA/MEDIA SHELL GAME: PFIZER ‘VACCINE’ WAS NOT APPROVED AFTER ALL

ORIGINAL LINK

Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.

ORIGINAL LINK