Sunday, January 22, 2023
How Troublesome Presidents Are Disposed of [Google blocked original posting]
Who’s Running the World? 8 Takeaways From This Week’s WEF Meeting [Google blocked original posting]
Experts confirm it’s Covid Injections & NOT Infections that cause Myocarditis [Google blocked original posting]
UNBELIEVABLE: Urgent Care Physician Warns of Stroke Season After Flu Season (VIDEO) [Google blocked original posting]
The U.S. Has Killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II
Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg. First published on November 15, 2015, this incisive report was among Global Research’s most popular articles. As a result of media censorship it is no longer featured by the search engines.
Whistleblower Reveals What is Behind the Mass Attacks on US Food Facilities (Video)
In the United States, dozens of food processing plants suspiciously caught fire over the past year. Remarkably, no one was present at the time of the fires. The Eco Health Alliance whistleblower, bioterrorism expert, military veteran, and scientist Dr.
Johnstone: Western Journalists Are Cowardly, Approval-Seeking Losers
Authored by Caitlin Johnstone,Research conducted by New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics into Russian trolling behavior on Twitter in the lead-up to the 2016 US presidential election has found Which is to say that all the years of hysterical shrieking about Russian trolls i
Fiery But Peaceful In Atlanta? CNN Once Again Suggests That Leftist Riots Are Not Violent
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
If there is one strategy that the political left relies on more than any other in their quest for better optics, it’s the strategy of gaslighting.
And, CNN is often at the forefront of many gaslighting campaigns when it comes to Antifa, BLM, or any other far left group that resorts to violence and property destruction in the name of “social justice.”
Recent riots in Atlanta by members of Antifa are bringing back memories of 2020 and 2021 when CNN called leftist riots “fiery but peaceful,” a level of propaganda that should only be seen in dystopian sci-fi movies but is now very real.
Well, the media outlet is at it again, platforming journalists who are more interested in spinning events to their political advantage rather than pursuing the truth.
Holy funking shlit, CNN pic.twitter.com/GAXYh2wZRU
— Jack Posobiec πΊπΈ (@JackPosobiec) January 22, 2023
Local Atlanta reporter calls the protest in Atlanta "largely peaceful protest" as a police cruiser is on fire in the background.
You can't make this stuff up. pic.twitter.com/tYJpJulxdH
— Largely peaceful protest 3sidedstory πΊπ² (@3sidedstory) January 22, 2023
It should be noted that the attacks in Atlanta were triggered after Antifa members allegedly fired on police officers as they entered an “autonomous zone” at the site of the future $90 million Atlanta Public Safety Training Center in a ‘clearing operation’ on Wednesday.
One officer was injured during the exchange, and one Antifa member was killed. In response, Antifa blamed Atlanta police and called for a ‘Night of Rage’.
Another reality to consider is that if a firefight broke out between conservative activists or a “militia” and police over an “autonomous zone”, and conservatives rioted in response, the same media talking heads would be incensed with anger and making accusations of terrorism and insurrection. The double standard in favor of leftist activists is a defining narrative of our era.
via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK
‘The Anti-Vaxxers Win’: Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Admits Vaccine Skeptics Were Right Not To Trust COVID Jab
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
“Dilbert” creator Scott Adams, who broadcasted that he took the COVID shot, now concedes that the “anti-vaxxers were right” not to trust the experimental mRNA jab that is now shown to be ineffective and even dangerous.
“I’m gonna tell you that the anti-vaxxers appear to be right,” Adams said Saturday on his podcast “Real Coffee With Scott Adams.”
“Anybody who did not get vaccinated, got a little omicron or maybe even a worse one but recovered, now you’ve got natural immunity and you have no vaccination in you. Can we all agree that was the winning path?”
“The smartest, happiest people are the ones who didn’t get the vaccination and they’re still alive,” he continued. “I want to make sure I’m not leaving any wiggle room for myself.”
“The anti-vax people appear to be the winners. The anti-vaxxers clearly are the winners at this point, and I think it’ll probably stay that way. And I don’t want to put any shade on that whatsoever. They came out the best. They have the winning position,” he added.
He went on to say that the unvaccinated have the “advantage” because they don’t have to worry about potential vaccine side effects in the future.
“The unvaccinated have a current advantage because they feel better that the thing they’re not worrying about is what I have to worry about, which is, ‘I wonder if that vaccination five years from now…” he said.
Adams also noted that those who took the default position of distrusting the government and corporations on the vaccines “won completely.”
“The anti-vaxxers were distrustful of big companies and big government. That’s never wrong. It’s never wrong to distrust government and big companies,” he said. “So if you took the position, ‘Let’s just distrust everything the government did,’ well, you won. You won completely. I did not end up in the right place. The right place would be natural immunity and no vaccination.”
But at one point, Adams claimed those skeptical of the COVID injection were simply driven by “heuristics” rather than available data.
“All of my fancy analytics got me to a bad place,” he said. “All of your heuristics — ‘don’t trust these guys’ is obvious — totally worked.”
But as The Liberty Daily pointed out, plenty of evidence was available long before the COVID jabs were officially rolled out:
– mRNA technology had been disastrous in ALL previous developments and tests, including horrible deaths for animal subjects a decade earlier.
– Anthony Fauci was leading the charge to promote the jabs, and as everyone should have been aware of before listening to him, his track record of giving advice in the early days of new diseases is abysmal. Lest we forget, this is the guy who went on national television to tell people they could catch AIDS just be being near an infected family member.
– One of the first nurses to get jabbed, Tiffany Dover, seemed to have an adverse reaction almost immediately. Some argue that she had a thing for needles, to which I would ask why they would pick someone who had a problem with needles to get jabbed on television? And why would she be a nurse if she’s scared of needles? And where is she now?
– Perhaps most importantly, by the time the jabs were ready to roll out, the death rates for Covid-19 had dropped dramatically. It was as if the numbers were artificially inflated ahead of the presidential election, only to have a perfectly timed miracle of three jabs simultaneously coming available a couple of weeks later.
Adams, who himself took Moderna’s COVID jab, had been criticized and ridiculed among the right for appearing to support the jab.
Adams has even threatened to sue political cartoonist Ben Garrison earlier this month for “defaming” him over his views on the COVID shot.
Scott Adams is threatening to sue Ben Garrison for this cartoon. https://t.co/pmWzembTmT pic.twitter.com/bkpDeuvgRB
— Andrew Fleischman (@ASFleischman) January 3, 2023
In any event, Adams’ admission is indicative of the sea change against the COVID injection as more data continues to emerge showing the COVID shot brings high risks of adverse reactions and offers no protection from the coronavirus.
Enjoyed this article? Consider donating, or visit InfowarsStore.com to ensure we continue bringing you hard-hitting info in this age of Deep State censorship!
Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury
Truth Social: @WhiteIsTheFury
Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury
Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury
Minds: @WhiteIsTheFury
Parler: @WhiteIsTheFury
via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK
The Davos “Debate” on “Disinformation”: The “Most Existential Problem” Facing the Planet Today

There has been much coverage over the resurfacing of former CNN host Brian Stelter as the host for a panel at the World Economic Forum on alleged disinformation and “hate speech.” Stelter previously called for censorship under a “harm reduction model” and led a panel at a conference where Democrats discussed how to shape the news. He was confronted over his own dissemination for false stories targeting Republicans on CNN. Yet, I was most struck by a statement from New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger who described “disinformation” as the “most existential” problem the world is facing today. Sulzberger insisted that disinformation is the reason why there is a loss of “trust” today. He ignores his own history in eroding that trust in the media through flagrantly biased decisions at the New York Times.
Former NYT editor Jill Abramson also slammed the participation of Sulzberger and the New York Times at Davos, denouncing it as a “corrupt circle-jerk” between media and business. She said that “the coverage was a sweetener to flatter the CEOs by seeing their names in the NYT.”
The panel was titled, “Clear & Present Danger of Disinformation” included panelists: New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger, Vice-President of the European Commission Vera JourovΓ‘, CEO of Internews Jeanne Bourgault, and Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass. The entire conference was notable in its omission of free speech advocates while inviting long advocates for censorship like Stelter.
Stelter asked his panel, “How does this discussion of disinformation relate to everything else happening today in Davos?”
Sulzberger responded:
“Well, first, thanks for having me is as part of this conversation. As you can imagine, this is something I really care deeply about. So, I think if you look at this question of disinformation, I think it maps basically to every other major challenge that we are grappling with as a society, and particularly the most existential among them. So, disinformation and in the broader set of misinformation, conspiracy, propaganda, clickbait, you know, the broader mix of bad information that’s corrupting information ecosystem, what it attacks is trust. And once you see, trust decline, what you then see is a society start to fracture, and so you see people fracture along tribal lines and, you know, that immediately undermines pluralism. And the undermining of pluralism is probably the most dangerous thing that can happen to a democracy. So I really — I think if if you’re spending this week thinking about the health of democracies and democratic erosion, I think it’s really import to work your way back up to where this starts.”
It was a telling statement. Sulzberger suggested that allowing some opposing views undermines “trust.” Indeed, allowing opposing views on Covid or election or global warming does erode trust in the media and the government. Society would be so less “fractured” if information is controlled and consistent.
via IFTTT
InoreaderURL: SECONDARY LINK