via IFTTT
Seeking Truth in a World of Propaganda. Links do not necessarily indicate agreement with stories or perspectives.
“Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.” - Plato
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
The Wisdom Of John Quincy Adams——A Republic, Not An Empire
ORIGINAL LINK
via IFTTT
via IFTTT
Don't Blame the Internet for Conspiracy Rumors
ORIGINAL LINK
via IFTTT
I have mixed feelings about Zeynep Tufekci's op-ed about conspiracy theories in today's New York Times. On the plus side, she recognizes that such stories aren't simply an irrational invasion from the fever swamps—that when elites are secretive and dishonest, suspicious speculations follow. But her arguments about the internet are much weaker.
"I'm originally from Turkey, so I'm used to my Western friends snickering at the prevalence of conspiracy theories in the Middle East," Tufekci writes. "It is frustrating, but the reason for these theories is not a mystery. Elites do practice excessive secrecy. Foreign powers have meddled in the region for decades. Institutions that are supposed to be trusted intermediaries, separating facts from fiction while also challenging the powerful, are few and weak." And the Middle East, obviously, isn't the only place where some or all of that is true:
People think that their governments are working against them, or at least not for them, and in some cases this is true. Ruling elites around the world are circling their wagons, and fueling more suspicion and mistrust. Reversing that would be the best defense against baseless paranoia...
Since Tufekci's piece is pegged to recent rumors about Hillary Clinton's health, it's worth noting a big reason those long-simmering stories just boomed: Last weekend, Clinton really did try to conceal a health problem. Hide one secret, and people find it easier to believe you're hiding more. It isn't the most significant case of secrecy sparking speculation, but it's a pretty clear-cut example.
So that's where Tufekci is right. What I have trouble buying is her argument that "new technologies" are making conspiracy theories more popular:
The new, internet-driven financing model for news outlets is great for spreading conspiracy theories. Each story lives or dies by how much attention it attracts. This rewards the outrageous, which can get clicks more easily.
However, conspiracy theories can live only to the degree they can find communities to flourish in. That's where social media comes in. Finding a community online has been great for many people—the dissident in Egypt, the gay teenager in a conservative town—but the internet is not Thor's hammer, which only the purest of heart can pick up. Connecting online also works for an anti-vaccination parent or a Sept. 11 truther. Conspiracists can organize online and can push their version of the world into the mainstream.
First of all: The profits-through-outrageousness business model did not begin with the internet. It emerges any time you've got a lot of commercial news outlets competing with each other, a fact you can confirm by looking back at the days when every big city had more than two dailies duking it out for readers. Or, hell, by looking at a city where you still have more than two dailies duking it out for readers? Remember this headline from 2002?
There was a legitimate story there about Bush being briefed on the threat of domestic Al Qaeda attacks—and there were two giant words that implied he knew those particular attacks were on the way. While I'm sure the Post got a lot of clicks that day, that cover was conceived with newsstand sales in mind.
In any event, conspiracy theories have always found "communities to flourish in," circulating in alternative media or via stories transmitted orally. The internet has made many of those communities more visible—now you can watch a rumor spread among people you've never met!—but more visible does not necessarily mean more widely believed. More people may be seeing those stories, but more people are seeing debunkings now too; it is easier than ever to check whether the yarn you just heard is an urban legend. (How I wish that Snopes existed when I was growing up.) It is far from clear that the theories are garnering more believers than the critiques, and it certainly can't simply be asserted as fact that they are. Both bullshit and bullshit detectors are plentiful online.
Bonus links: Hillary Clinton isn't the first presidential candidate to be dogged by allegations of a health cover-up. To read about a case where the rumors were bunk, go here. To read about some cases where there really was a cover-up, go here.
via IFTTT
CDC Wants to Expand Power to Eliminate Measles — What You Need To Know and Do Now
ORIGINAL LINK
Related Articles:
Dissolving Illusions About the Measles Vaccine
Recently Vaccinated Individuals Found to Spread Disease
Measles in Disneyland: Third MMR Shot and Vaccine Exemption Ban
Comments (41)
via IFTTT
By Barbara Loe Fisher
I remember the day in 2007, when I was standing in front of a Maryland country courthouse videotaping interviews with mothers and fathers lined up with children who had been thrown out of school for failing to show proof they had gotten chickenpox and hepatitis B shots.1,2
State public health officials were threatening the parents with fines and jail time and suddenly, as we were talking, men in uniforms with guns and dogs emerged from the courthouse and headed toward us.
In the pit of my stomach was the sickening feeling that people in countries throughout history have felt when the exercise of freedom of thought, speech and conscience is met with a demonstration of police power wielded by agents of the State.
Today, the American people are challenged, as they have never been before, to confront the expansion of government authority over our bodies and the bodies of our children, specifically the exercise of police power to take us into custody and isolate us without our consent whenever public health officials believe we are sick or could become sick.
At stake is the preservation of human rights and cultural values that have been part of America since the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights defined civil liberties two centuries ago.
Are public health officials getting ready to apprehend and quarantine you or your child if they believe you are, or could become, infected with measles or any other communicable disease they decide is a threat to the public health?
Are they enlisting airline and other public transportation personnel to help them conduct a dragnet that will be easy for you to get caught up in when you travel?
Once you are detained, can they hold you for 72 hours against your will until you agree to be vaccinated or they declare you are no longer a threat? Is this for real or not? You be the judge.
CDC Moves to Amend Public Health Service Act
During the last days of summer, while we were vacationing, shopping for school supplies or, in the case of Virginia families, while we were busy pleading with legislators to protect the medical and religious vaccine exemptions in state vaccine law.3,4
Public health officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were quietly publishing a very long Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the August 15, 2016, Federal Register to amend federal public health law.5
The part of the Public Health Service Act they want to strengthen is the part that gives them power under the U.S. Constitution6,7 to restrict the freedom of a person entering the U.S. or traveling between states if they believe the person is infected or could become infected with certain kinds of communicable diseases.8
You only have until October 14, 2016, to make a public comment to the CDC and contact your legislators in Congress, so please take this seriously because what the CDC is proposing applies to all Americans who travel outside the country or between states, especially on commercial airlines.
In the future, it could extend to any form of transportation when you cross state lines, including by bus, train or car.
Involves States With Police Powers
This Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) involves the participation of federally funded state health departments and state facilities, too, because the majority of police power to detain, isolate and quarantine citizens belongs to the states.9,10
Many state legislatures, which have legal authority to pass laws controlling communicable diseases within state borders, voted to give public health officials expanded police powers after September 11, 2001, by adopting the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA)11,12,13 and The Turning Point Model State Public Health Act,14 created at Georgetown University's Center for Law and the Public's Health and the CDC Collaborating Center Promoting Health through Law.
If this NPRM is implemented and the states follow suit, you and your children could be vulnerable to detention and quarantine if health officials decide you are, or could become, a transmitter of measles or other infections because, for example, your electronic medical records reveal you have not gotten every dose of every CDC recommended vaccine.
Let's not forget that no government agency, corporation or person who creates, produces, sells, licenses, recommends, mandates or administers a federally recommended vaccine to you or your child, has accountability or liability in a court of law in front of a jury of your peers if you become brain damaged or die from vaccination.15,16,17
The Quarantine List Was Short, but Not Anymore
In a nutshell, the federal government is consolidating and strengthening power that was originally used to prevent persons with yellow fever and cholera from disembarking from ships entering U.S. ports in the 19th century and causing epidemics on land.18
For most of our country's history, the list of contagious diseases that allowed government health officials to detain and quarantine people without their informed consent was appropriately very short, confined to a few very serious contagious diseases, including yellow fever, smallpox, cholera, diphtheria, infectious tuberculosis and the plague.
It is worth noting that polio was never put on that list. In the past 15 years, CDC officials persuaded two presidents to issue Executive Orders in 2003, 2005 and 2014 to expand the "isolate and quarantine" list.
In 2003, Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers such as Ebola and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) were added.19
In 2005, pandemic influenza was added.20 But in 2014, the Presidential Executive Order did not name a specific disease that would warrant detention and quarantine: It simply described "diseases associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness" that have "the potential to cause a pandemic" or are "highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled."21
Now, the word "morbidity" means the incidence of, or how often a disease occurs in a population,22 and is very different from mortality, which means death. There are many viral and bacterial infections that occur quite often in our country, like bronchitis and the stomach flu.
Almost every infection has the potential to cause serious complications, injury or death for some people, but that doesn't mean government health officials should have the power to take you into custody and isolate you if you look sick or have been around someone who is sick.
Displaying symptoms of respiratory illness is wide-open territory, and those symptoms can be due to everything from severe allergies, asthma and COPD to sinus infections, pertussis, measles, chickenpox, and pneumonia.
Other symptoms that could get you detained under the NPRM are vomiting and diarrhea or a fever over 100 degrees F, which are common to everything from allergic reactions, inflammatory bowel disease, salmonella and norovirus infections to hangovers and the common cold. How about a headache with stiff neck that could be nothing more than a bad migraine?
CDC Puts Measles in Same Basket With Ebola
So people took notice when the CDC announced on August 15 that there was an urgent need to amend federal public health law to "reduce and mitigate the risk of outbreaks of Ebola, MERS, measles and other communicable diseases in the U.S." Ebola and ... MEASLES?
Let's see, Ebola is a lethal, highly contagious virus that can quickly overwhelm and damage the human immune system and cause uncontrollable bleeding from the eyes, nose, mouth and every orifice, killing 25 to 90 percent of people who get it.23,24
And then there is measles, which I remember having as a child for a week while I took naps, wore sunglasses and read books with my mom, ate chicken noodle soup and sipped fruit juice until the spots went away. That was my experience with measles in the 1950s and it was the commonplace experience of the majority of baby boomers in America, who got measles or chickenpox.
In 1960, three years before the measles vaccine was licensed, the death rate for that childhood infection was 0.2 cases per 100,000 persons.25 Before the chickenpox vaccine was licensed in 1995, there were about 100 deaths per year in a U.S. population of 260 million people.26 A case of measles or chickenpox does not come close to qualifying as a public health emergency that requires a person to being taken into custody by a government official.
Have a Rash? You Could Be Detained
And yet, the CDC is arguing that: "The ongoing persistence of measles in the United States provides a good example of the need for this NPRM," and "Although not a quarantinable communicable disease, every case of measles in the United States is considered a public health emergency because of its extremely high transmissibility."
So in the NPRM, the CDC defines a potentially "ill" person deserving of special government scrutiny to be someone with "areas of the skin with multiple red bumps, red, flat spots or blister-like bumps filled with fluid or pus that are intact or partially crusted over," warning ominously that "the presence of skin rash, along with fever, may indicate that the traveler has measles, rubella (German measles), varicella (chickenpox) meningococcal disease or smallpox."
Smallpox? As in the infectious disease that the smallpox vaccine is supposed to have eradicated from the Earth? Or is the CDC talking about weaponized smallpox, as in the weapons of mass destruction that have never been found and prompted the U.S. Congress to create a lucrative public-private partnership with the pharmaceutical industry after September 11, 2001, to create lots of new liability-free vaccines under the umbrella of "bioterrorism?"27,28
OK, let's accept that there is an extremely small possibility that the traveler could be infected with weaponized smallpox, but let's also admit that it is far more likely that the traveler with a skin rash is suffering from a bad sunburn, acne, rosacea, eczema, psoriasis, the hives or severe allergies and that a mild fever could be due to an old fashioned cold.
The specter of babies with eczema, teenagers with acne and families who spent too much time in the sun being pulled off airplanes and detained in CDC quarantine centers29 at airports around the country is comical, if it were not such an obvious warning that Americans are in clear and present danger from federal government overreach.
CDC officials appear to be obsessed with measles in the NPRM. They point out that "different diseases may elicit different levels of responses at the public health department level, with a more rapid response for highly infectious diseases like measles that can be prevented with timely post-exposure prophylaxis, and a more measured response for less infectious diseases like TB [tuberculosis]." The term "post-exposure prophylaxis" means they want to inject you with MMR vaccine.
TB has been on the "isolation and quarantine" list for decades. Now the CDC is implying that measles is more dangerous than TB. Come to think of it, the NPRM looks like it was written with Merck — the sole source supplier of MMR vaccine in the U.S. — at the drawing table.
CDC Wants Airline Personnel to Report If You Are Sick
In the NPRM, the CDC uses their familiar refrain, "communicable diseases are just a flight away," and this is a heads up that your airport experience is about to become an even bigger nightmare than it already is if their plan becomes law.
Frequent flyers, you should know that the CDC wants to, in effect, deputize commercial airline personnel to step up surveillance on passengers who have rashes, diarrhea, vomiting, low grade fevers, coughing or otherwise "appear obviously unwell" and report them to health officials.
I wonder how much money it is going to cost the airlines to train their personnel to be infection control nurses and snitch on passengers who "appear unwell," like coughing too much or going to the bathroom too often? And if you are suspected of being sick or likely to get sick with an infection that health officials consider serious enough to qualify for detention, here is what will happen.
After You Are Taken Into Custody
After you are taken into government custody, it appears you can be held for 72 hours without the right to contact an attorney or anyone else to appeal your detention. You will be asked to sign a contract with the CDC that you consent to the "public health measures" being applied to you or your minor child, which may include "quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination and treatment."
But even if you don't voluntarily agree to sign that contract, public health officials can still do whatever they want to do to you because "the individual's consent shall not be considered a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority" by the CDC. And if government officials do release you from detention, you can be electronically tracked and monitored, including by electronic tracking devices you have to wear or by email, cell phone texts, video conferencing and voicemail.
It will be easy for the CDC to electronically track and monitor your movements after they release you. Since the early 1990s, when Congress passed the phony HIPPA "privacy" legislation, federal health officials have been using your tax dollars to create and operate electronic medical records and vaccine tracking systems that use health care identifiers to keep tabs on how healthy or sick you are, what kind of drugs you take and which vaccines you have gotten.30,31
Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are hooked in, so your medical information, including your vaccination status, can be shared with government researchers, pharmaceutical companies and law enforcement officials.32
You Can Be Fined and Jailed for Disobeying CDC Orders
And if the CDC finds you guilty of disobeying their orders and they believe you transmitted an infection to someone else, you can be fined "$100,000 if the violation does not result in a death, or one year in jail, or both, or a fine of no more than $250,000 if the violation results in a death, or one year in jail or both."
Plus, they have added this curious language without explanation: "Violations by organizations are subject to a fine of no more than $200,000 per event if the violation does not result in a death, or $500,000 per event it the violation results in a death."
Right now, measles is not officially on the "detain and quarantine list." But measles easily could be put on that "isolate and quarantine" list if CDC officials convince the president to issue an Executive Order if or when the NPRM becomes law after October 14, 2016.
Eradicating Measles From the World
It is no mystery why the CDC gave measles a lot of attention in the NPRM. Measles is the next infection that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC want to "eradicate" through global forced vaccination programs like they did with smallpox and polio.33,34 In underdeveloped countries, armed police with dogs join forces with doctors with syringes and hunt down every last citizen to get them vaccinated35 with, in this case, an MMR shot or two, or three — or more.
Reportedly, the global measles eradication campaign36 will kick into high gear after public health officials soon make the announcement that polio has been eradicated from the Earth.37 That declaration will be made, even though vaccine strain polio paralysis is crippling children who have been given live oral polio vaccine over and over and over again in mass vaccination "pulse" campaigns.38,39
The Long Arm of the Public Health Police
It looks like federal health officials are upping the ante in the high stakes chess game that industry, government and medical trade have been playing with the freedom of the American people for a long time.
The long arm of the public health police is being felt already in states like Mississippi, West Virginia and California, which have eliminated vaccine exemptions, while forced vaccination lobbyists in dozens of other states are attacking exemptions protecting freedom of thought, conscience and religious belief.40
Pediatricians are being encouraged to become belligerent enforcers of vaccination and deny medical care to children whose parents refuse to give them every one of the 69 doses of 16 vaccines CDC officials recommend.41,42
And nobody can forget the manufactured public health crisis in 2015, when a few cases of measles at Disneyland turned into a media feeding frenzy, with calls for doctors to be stripped of their medical licenses for criticizing vaccine safety and providing care to unvaccinated children, and for censorship of freedom of speech about vaccination and for parents of unvaccinated children to be charged with medical child abuse, sued, fined and jailed.43
Sound familiar? Most Americans support laws that prevent people infected with a highly contagious lethal virus like Ebola from entering or traveling in the country.
That is why there was a justifiable public uproar in the summer of 2014, when public health officials failed to exercise the Constitutional authority they have always had to prevent persons infected with or exposed to Ebola from entering or traveling in the U.S.44 But measles is not Ebola or chickenpox, and it's not smallpox.
Millions of Americans Want Vaccine Freedom of Choice
Public surveys show that 87 percent of parents have declined one or more federally recommended vaccines for their children45 and one-third of all U.S. adults46 and 42 percent of Americans under age 3047 don't think parents should be forced to vaccinate their children.
That is a lot of Americans wanting to exercise freedom of thought, speech and conscience when it comes to vaccination. But even supporters of mandatory vaccination laws need to pause and reflect upon a federal government plan to take into custody and quarantine people who have a rash or cough a lot.
Just read the hundreds of public comments already posted on the CDC's website by outraged citizens.48 After you do that, please post your own comment too, BEFORE October 14, 2016, and contact your members of Congress,49 who may not be aware of what the CDC is trying to do.
Signing an online petition or "liking" an article on Facebook is not enough. You need to make direct contact by phone, email or in person with the people who represent you in Congress and express your sincere concerns.
The CDC's proposed change to the Public Health Service Act is not about health. It is about taking away civil liberties that keep Americans safe from tyranny. It is about getting permission to tag, track and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, so there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.
The question is: Will American people let them get away with it? Will you let them get away with it? Or will you stand with the growing citizen army of enlightened Americans who are defending the human right to freedom of thought, speech, conscience, religion and informed consent in this great country of ours?
You know what needs to be done. Stand up and protect your civil liberties now, so you will never have to wish you had when you still had the freedom to do it. Go to NVIC.org and NVICAdvocacy.org to learn more. It's your health. Your family. Your choice.
Related Articles:
Dissolving Illusions About the Measles Vaccine Recently Vaccinated Individuals Found to Spread Disease Measles in Disneyland: Third MMR Shot and Vaccine Exemption Banvia IFTTT
Monday, September 12, 2016
Espionage Insiders: Welcome to the Post-Forgetting World
ORIGINAL LINK
via IFTTT
“I can’t think of any other issue that moved people so quickly.” By security expert Bruce Schneier’s estimation, more than 700 million people* worldwide changed their behavior on the Internet as a direct result of what Edward Snowden’s NSA leak revealed about government surveillance. Even more amazing: they all did it within one year.
What motivated so many private citizens to take action? “They did that because of secrets. The biggest enemy to society, the thing that is most corrosive, is secrecy,” says Schneier. “Edward Snowden started the dialogue.”
The effects of the massive security breach reverberate years later, not just in how often we change our passwords, but also in how we live. “As human beings, the fact that we forget is integral to how we function in society, to how we heal emotionally, and to how we grow. Imagine you can recall every conversation you ever had with your spouse. Is that a world you want to live in? That is what we are moving towards: It’s on email, it’s recorded. There’s a loss of ephemera. We have never before been in a post-forgetting world.”
While others argue that we are making a fair trade for our safety, Schneier starkly objects. “Surveillance-based security invades privacy. If a person says ‘I have nothing to hide,’ I say that privacy is not about something to hide. It’s about maintaining your autonomy in the world.”
Surely, though, surveillance is necessary to protect the homeland from terrorism, right? Not according to Schneier, who argues that in reality the increased invasion of privacy does little to keep us safe. “A trade off is not being made. We have erred too far in the side of security. When you are exposed, you don’t feel secure.” He believes that what keeps us safe—and free—are the tried-and-true elements of investigation, intelligence, and emergency response. “Blunt surveillance of the population doesn’t get you anything except political control. If you want to prevent political freedom, that’s what you use.” Accordingly, Schneier calls for less surveillance and more public process, while acknowledging that the issue is tremendously complex.
The solution, he knows, is not a simple one—in part because the ethos of spying is something we take for granted in our culture today. “The surveillance economy is huge,” Schneier explains. “That’s the fundamental problem. There is an entire economy based on spying on you and using the data against your interests.”
As citizens, Schneier notes that we’re complicit in what we surrender. From the medical information our FitBits offer up to the way our phones track our movements, we need to acknowledge how we expose ourselves. “People keep their heads in sand on everything,” he says. “Climate change, globalization… engaging is hard, and I understand why people don’t want to do it. I don’t think people really understand what we are giving up.”
What’s at stake? Peace of mind, for one thing. “Google collects your data and advertises to you, convincing you to buy things you wouldn’t otherwise,” he says. “It’s psychological.” An example, he says, is that our health data is sold and then “treatments” and cures are pushed on us through aggressive advertising. “All of that is based on your data. You are the product.”
Thinking of it in that way, it’s easy to start to feel like our society is already too far down the rabbit hole. “Yes, we have gone too far—but we can go back,” says Schneier. “Though no time soon. We are too punch-drunk on data.”
There is, however, an empowerment in knowing the truth. “History will judge Edward Snowden as a hero,” he says. “But first, the feelings have to subside. They are too raw right now. He exposed government abuse, and all of these things that weren’t right. He betrayed people because he defended a higher ideal.”
In a world where everything we do is subject to record, does Schneier think it is possible to be truly free? “I don’t believe our experiment in liberty is over,” Schneier says. I just don’t believe that. It’s too ridiculous.”
Bruce Schneier is an internationally renowned security technologist and author. To read his blog, Schneier on Security, click here. Mr. Schneier’s perspective is offered as part of a four-part series by Salon.com on behalf of Open Road Studios in celebration of the film SNOWDEN, in theaters September 2016. To read more in this series, start here.
via IFTTT
Physicists & Engineers Publish Another 9/11 Study: All THREE Buildings Were “Destroyed By Controlled Demolition”
ORIGINAL LINK
via IFTTT
Steven Jones is a former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, his major research interests have been in the areas of fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry. He has authored or co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of extremely high temperatures during the WTC destruction and evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.
Robert Korol is a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, as well as a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute of Canada. His major research interests have been in the areas of structural mechanics and steel structures. More recently, he has undertaken experimental research into the post-buckling resistance of H-shaped steel columns and into the energy absorption associated with pulverization of concrete floors.
Anthony Szamboti is a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries. Since 2006, he has authored or co-authored a number of technical papers on the WTC high-rise failures that are published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies and in the International Journal of Protective Structures.
Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers. In 2015, he authored AE- 911Truth’s Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. He holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Together, they recently published a paper titled “15 Years Later, On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses” in the European Scientific Journal.“
In it, they conclude that:
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.
Apart from all of the evidence presented in the paper, they also point out how more than 125 first responders were documented saying that they saw hear, and/or felt explosions prior to and/or during the collapses.
It’s also emphasized in the study that the collapse mechanics are only a fraction of the available evidence indicating that the airplane impacts and fires had nothing to do with the building collapse:
Videos show that the upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video shows the upper sections that purportedly descended all the way to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs also show numerous high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from point-like sources. NIST refers to these as “puffs of smoke” but fails to properly analyze them. NIST also provides no explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers’ concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all directions. NIST sidesteps the well-documented presence of molten metal throughout the debris field and asserts that the orange molten metal seen pouring out of WTC 2 for the seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum from the aircraft combined with organic materials. Yet experiments have shown that molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic materials, has a silvery appearance—thus suggesting that the orange molten metal was instead emanating from a thermite reaction being used to weaken the structure. Meanwhile, unreacted nano-thermitic material has since been discovered in multiple independent WTC dust samples.
More CE Articles On 9/11
15 Years Later & People Are Still Waking Up To These Facts About 9/11
Another CIA Officer Comes Forward About 9/11 & ISIS
24 Hard Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Debunked
Donald Rumsfeld On Building 7 & 9/11: How Is This Even Possible?
Chechnya High Rise Burns For 29 Hours With No Collapse, What About WTC 7?
via IFTTT
Sunday, September 11, 2016
"This Is An Unbelievable Disgrace For The Country" - Austria Stunned After Symbolic Election Delayed
ORIGINAL LINK
via IFTTT
Austrian conspiracy theorists have had a bumper year in 2016.
First, in the April 24 presidential election, the frontrunning candidate of Austria's anti-immigrant Freedom Party, Norbert Hofer, who many said was virtually guaranteed to become the central European country's first "right-wing" president, mysteriously lost when some 31,000 mailed-in ballots tipped the vote against him in the last second, handing the election to his far more moderate, and pro-European challenged, Van der Bellen. Hofer’s defeat sparked widespread relief across the ranks of Europe's unlected establishment bureaucrats, as his victory would mark yet another significant moment in the advance of nationalism across EU member states. As Newsweek put it, "in the wake of Brexit, it would be seen as another defeat for the European political establishment."
Accusations immediately emerged that the vote had been rigged, with the traditional response that these are merely the deranged ramblings of sore loser "nationalists." Only... that was not the case, and in July Austria's Constitutional Court ruled that the presidential runoff election must be held again, after it found "widespread" voting fraud, handing yet another victory to "conspiracy theorists" everywhere.
Then, following the surge in terrorist attacks in France and Germany in July, an August Gallup polls showed that Hofer's lead over his opponent Van der Belden had continued to grow, showing the midpoint of the wide range of support for Hofer at 52 percent—one point higher than a poll in early July—versus 48 percent for Van der Bellen.
At this point the establishment was clearly panicking, which may have indirectly led to the lastest fiasco surrounding what has already become the most scandalous presidential election in recent European history, an election that has little practical - but dramatic and widespread symbolic - value for Europe.
As AFP reports, it is now virtually certain that the election scheduled for October 2, and which Hofer will not lose this time, will not be held after all, as an "embarrassing postponement of Austria's high-stakes October 2 presidential election looked all but inevitable Saturday, because of technical problems involving glue failing to stick on postal votes."
In the wake of the abovementioned May presidential election, which was annulled after Austria's highest court upheld claims of procedural irregularities made by the narrowly-defeated far-right, a new election had been scheduled for October 2. This necessitated fresh elections but this time there appear to be... problems with glue on postal votes not sticking, making them invalid.
On Saturday independent ecologist Alexander Van der Bellen joined his rival in the vote, Norbert Hofer from the far-right, in saying he now expects a postponement.
"I don't believe that October 2 is possible any more," Van der Bellen, 72, told a news conference. "I hope that (the new election) can still take place this year." But they may not... because the glue on the same postal votes that were used to rig the last election is "no longer sticking."
Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka meanwhile made his clearest indication yet of a postponement, saying that "it does not look like" the problems can be resolved in time. He is due to make an announcement on Monday.
According to local media, the October election may now not even take place in 2016: Die Presse daily cited unnamed sources as saying that the government was looking at several possible dates in November, but that mid-December or even January were being considered.
Pushing the election back poses legal problems, however, and the government is considering drawing up special legislation allowing it to happen.
Some called this farce for what it is: "this is an unbelievable disgrace for... the whole country," Die Presse said in an editorial entitled "Banana Republic".
Meanwhile Hofer, 45, officially launched his election campaign in Wels in northern Austria despite the likely postponement, hitting out at the "stupidity" of allowing mass immigration by "economic migrants". The May 22 vote, a run-off after a first round in April, saw Van der Bellen narrowly beat Hofer by just 31,000 votes. The FPOe has stoked concerns about recent record immigration, and should Hofer eventually win it would make Austria the first country in Europe since 1945 to elect a nationalist president, and unleash even more anti-immigrant sentiment across Europe just in time for the all important French presidential elections where National Front's Marine le Pen has a substantial advantage.
As reported before, the role of the Austrian president is largely ceremonial, but a victory by Hofer - symbolic as it may be - would be a major boost to Europe's other surging populist movements.
And now the "conspiracy theorists" can come up with alternative, and has been the case, correct, explanations for what really happened.
via IFTTT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)