The Elephant in the Room – Did the U.S. Government Kill Its Own Citizens at Parkland?

ORIGINAL LINK

Troubling findings continue to emerge in the Parkland mass shooting. Eyewitness interviews suggesting a cover-up and other curious circumstances continue to surface even as the mainstream media goes into overdrive trying to censor alternative news sites contradicting the “official” narrative. The vitriol for any alternative view is evident with just a quick perusal of news from modern Pravda’s talking heads.

Not only are the accounts of the mass shooting they’re offering incredible, and the anti-gun narrative sprung in effortless fashion with students leading the charge, a relentless condemnation of “thought crimes” is underway.

The media wants you to ignore the fact there are numerous accounts from eyewitnesses stating that active shooter “drills” were going on at the school leading up to the event. The odds of having active shooter drills at a school only to have an active shooter show up are astronomically low.

Further, anyone who studies false flag events knows drills are held before being “flipped live” and turned into reality. Captain Eric May, former Army intelligence officer puts it this way:

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out.

This is how historian Webster Tarpley claims 9/11 was conducted by forces within the U.S. government, with no less than 46 drills going on that fateful day. Many of the drills were identical to “terror” events that actually happened that day. And indeed, drills often accompany “terror” events – even in the 2005 London bombings.

But, getting back to Parkland. The above interview from a student raises more troubling questions than answers. The Parkland senior claims she walked down the hall with Nikolas Cruz even as the mass shooting was underway! How could Nikolas Cruz be in class with her, and conducting a mass shooting at the same time? Of course, the student states she believes there had to be at least two mass shooters since she saw Cruz in the hallway – obviously unarmed as she made a joke with him, saying “I’m surprised it wasn’t you!” – after the principal came on the intercom requesting evacuation of the school.

Was Cruz a patsy? Was he brainwashed with Project Orion? One of the more lucid comments TNMM found regarding information that contradicts the official narrative:

Sounds like an FBI and CIA operation. Inform children to not be alarmed when hearing gunfire. Allow a mentally ill person, whom they were informed of and clearly investigated, to carry out a terrorist act. By telling the children to not be alarmed of gunfire from a drill, they insured many casualties.

That’s one possibility. There are many others. None of them are very flattering for officials and the government, including the fact officers stood down and waited around outside while the shooting was underway in the school! The media and government have proven time and again they are not to be trusted on any number of issues. So, skepticism is obviously warranted, especially when they tell us not to even think about looking behind the curtain or we’ll de-platform you.

This is the elephant in the room, the million dollar question that nobody seems to be asking or even concerned about. Are forces inside the U.S. government, specifically the CIA and FBI killing their own citizens by conducting false flags to fullfill former Attorney General Eric Holder’s 1995 demand?

We just have to be repetitive about this. It’s not enough to have a catchy ad on a Monday and then only do it every Monday. We have to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.

Modern America is so full of lies it’s hard to know where falsehood ends and where the truth begins. Especially with “official” government statements and mainstream mierda fake news.

That said, if the CIA and FBI are conducting these mass shootings, or setting up circumstances so mentally deranged patsies can be fingered when the deed is done, where is President Trump on this issue? Is he controlled opposition? Or is he playing 4D chess as his supporters claim?

The fact the U.S. government could be committing acts of treason and mass murder hangs in the air like a thick fog. And yet, nobody seems to be talking about it.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

via IFTTT

Masha Gessen: Did a Russian Troll Farm’s Inflammatory Posts Really Sway the 2016 Election for Trump?

https://youtu.be/cVNFcq980lM

Ben Swann Exposes FDA, DEA Deception On Kratom

ORIGINAL LINK

The FDA, of course, as with its corporate-supported attack on natural supplements and support of GMOs, has used incredibly faulty science to come to their conclusion that kratom is the same as heroin and other opiates, as well as causing deaths...

via IFTTT

Peer Reviewed Study Asserts US History of Interfering in Foreign Elections

ORIGINAL LINK

Washington, D.C. — The mainstream media continues to report heavily on Russian interference in the U.S. election process narrative, but according to a peer reviewed study by Dov Levin, a fellow in the Institute for Politics and Strategy at Carnegie Mellon University, the United States is king when it comes to election meddling.

Attempts at intervening in the internal domestic politics of other countries is nothing new, and the U.S. and Russia both have a long history of spreading political propaganda, covertly supporting military coups, channeling funds and rigging polls, according to Levin’s research.

Levin’s research indicates that between 1946 and 2000 there were 117 combined “partisan electoral interventions” between the United States and the Soviet Union/Russia, or “one in every nine competitive national level executive election”; with the U.S. accounting for nearly 70 percent of the cases of election meddling.

In a brief summary of his research, Levin wrote:

In a dataset I constructed (called PEIG) the US and the USSR/Russia have intervened in this manner 117 times between 1946 and 2000–or, put another way, in about one of every nine competitive national level executive elections during this period. Both countries used a variety of methods for this purpose, including public threats or promises, the secret provision of money to the preferred party or candidate’s campaign, “dirty tricks” such as the release of true (or false) damaging information about the undesired side, or either an increase in foreign aid or other assistance before election day or a withdrawal this kind of aid.

At least 21 of the interventions reportedly took place in the post-Cold War era between 1990 and 2000, of which 18 were carried out by the United States. The cases involved varying degrees of interference, but nearly two thirds of the meddling was done covertly, with voters being completely unaware that a foreign power was attempting to influence the election process and results.

“60 different independent countries have been the targets of such interventions,” Levin noted, with 45 being allegedly targeted by the United States.  “The targets came from a large variety of sizes and populations, ranging from small states such as Iceland and Grenada to major powers such as West Germany, India, and Brazil.”

A Channel 4 News report on Levin’s research highlighted some of the specific countries that were targeted by covert electoral intervention operations:

According to Levin’s research, those countries where secret tactics have been deployed by the US include: Guatemala, Brazil, El Salvador, Haiti, Panama, Israel, Lebanon, Iran, Greece, Italy, Malta, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, South Vietnam and Japan.

For Russia, the list of covert interventions includes: France, Denmark, Italy, Greece, West Germany, Japan, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Congo, Venezuela, Chile, Costa Rica, and the US.

Channel 4 also noted that “Covert interventions have been done by many countries over the years and – because they are shrouded in secrecy – it’s impossible to get a comprehensive picture of every instance across the world.”

“Although they usually get far less international attention and media coverage than various violent forms of meddling, partisan electoral interventions, or attempts by foreign powers to intervene in elections in other countries in order to help or hinder one of the candidates or parties, are actually quite common,” Levin summarized. “Such interventions can frequently have significant effects on election results in the intervened country, increasing the vote share of the assisted side by 3% on average – enough to determine the identity of the winner in many case.”

Levin’s figures do not include military coups or regime change attempts following the election of a candidate the U.S. opposed.

The post Peer Reviewed Study Asserts US History of Interfering in Foreign Elections appeared first on Ben Swann's Truth In Media.

via IFTTT

'Social media is causing a mental health crisis', says head of British university hit by seven student suicides

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5424587/Social-media-websites-causing-mental-health-crisis.html

CNN Journalists Resign: Latest Example of Media Recklessness on the Russia Threat

https://theintercept.com/2017/06/27/cnn-journalists-resign-latest-example-of-media-recklessness-on-the-russia-threat/

Now They've Crossed the Line

Scholar Explains Why Do People Believe in Conspiracy Theories

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201802211061851040-illuminati-conspiracy-explained/

Russiagate or Intelgate?

https://www.thenation.com/article/russiagate-or-intelgate/

Parents Lose Custody of Child for Refusing to Support Transgenderism

Parents Lose Custody of Child for Refusing to Support Transgenderism:



'via Blog this'